Suppr超能文献

桌面模拟器:通用培训的关键?

Desktop simulator: key to universal training?

作者信息

Bruynzeel Hanna, de Bruin Anton F J, Bonjer Hendrik J, Lange Johan F, Hop Wim C J, Ayodeji Ifesegun D, Kazemier Geert

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2007 Sep;21(9):1637-40. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9222-z. Epub 2007 Feb 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Training of skills in simulators is preferred over learning on patients so as to avoid undue injury to patients and to allow more efficient use of resources. Most simulators are costly and require a dedicated space. The aim of this study was to evaluate a simple desktop simulator, the Mirror Trainer.

METHODS

Thirty medical students were randomly assigned to three groups. One group was taught laparoscopic suturing in the Mirror Trainer, the second group used a pelvic training box, while the third group served as a control group and did not receive any training. All suture attempts during training were recorded on video. A blinded, independent investigator analyzed the videos. At the completion of training, the suturing skills of each participant were evaluated in an animal model.

RESULTS

Training with the Mirror Trainer required less time than with the pelvic trainer (p < 0.001). Compared with the control group, the Mirror Trainer group and the pelvic trainer group were significantly faster at creating three knots in the pig (p = 0.001 and p = 0.004, respectively). Both training groups performed equally well on the animal model (p = 0.99).

CONCLUSION

The Mirror Trainer and the pelvic trainer are equally effective in teaching laparoscopic suturing skills but training with the Mirror Trainer requires less time, can be done on any desktop, and is less costly.

摘要

背景

在模拟器中进行技能训练比在患者身上学习更受青睐,这样可以避免对患者造成不必要的伤害,并能更有效地利用资源。大多数模拟器成本高昂且需要专门的空间。本研究的目的是评估一种简单的桌面模拟器——镜像训练器。

方法

30名医科学生被随机分为三组。一组在镜像训练器中学习腹腔镜缝合,第二组使用盆腔训练箱,而第三组作为对照组,不接受任何训练。训练期间所有的缝合尝试都被录制下来。一名不知情的独立研究者对视频进行分析。训练结束后,在动物模型中评估每位参与者的缝合技能。

结果

使用镜像训练器训练所需的时间比使用盆腔训练箱少(p < 0.001)。与对照组相比,镜像训练器组和盆腔训练箱组在猪身上打三个结的速度明显更快(分别为p = 0.001和p = 0.004)。两个训练组在动物模型上的表现相当(p = 0.99)。

结论

镜像训练器和盆腔训练箱在教授腹腔镜缝合技能方面同样有效,但使用镜像训练器训练所需时间更少,可以在任何桌面上进行,且成本更低。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验