• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对通过网络借助公民协作编写的关于健康生活方式的易读信息材料的评估。

Evaluation of easy-to-read information material on healthy life-styles written with the help of citizens' collaboration through networking.

作者信息

Daghio M Monica, Fattori Giuseppe, Ciardullo Anna V

机构信息

Laboratory for Citizen Empowerment, Communication and Marketing Unit, Local Health Unit, Via S. Giovanni del Cantone, 23 - 41100 - Modena, Italy.

出版信息

Promot Educ. 2006;13(3):191-6.

PMID:17294709
Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate if easy-to-read information material on the prevention of chronic-degenerative diseases through healthy lifestyle co-written by communicators, educators, physicians and citizens -using a networking strategy- could be judged comprehensible. Readability scores were computed. The survey involved 100 individuals attending our centralized booking centre for medical appointments during an "index week". They filled out an anonymous questionnaire, just before and after they had read the material. Readability and comprehensibility frequencies were calculated. The participants had a mean age of 59.1+/-15.1 (SD) years (range 19-81yrs), 62% were females. Twenty-six percent of them had received no education, 30% "primary", 28% "secondary", and 14% had a "degree". According to readability scores, the booklet was "readable" by all persons who had finished primary school. Of the 100 participants, 40 percent found the booklet's language to be "easy" or "very easy", 46% "sufficiently easy", and 14% "difficult" for laypersons to understand. Ninety-four percent of them found no unintelligible words in the text. Education levels showed no differences. Readers' answers were more correct after they had read the booklet. The pre-test showed that 61+/-26% of the readers answered the comprehensibility items correctly. After reading the booklet, 81+/-17% of them gave correct answers. The after-minus-before net increase in knowledge was +20% (95% CIs +8 to +32%). The booklet was designed and written using a networking strategy with the help of the local population. It was found to be easy to read and quite clear.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估由传播者、教育工作者、医生和市民共同撰写的、通过健康生活方式预防慢性退行性疾病的通俗易懂的信息材料(采用网络策略)是否能被认为易于理解。计算了可读性得分。该调查涉及在“索引周”期间到我们的集中医疗预约中心就诊的100个人。他们在阅读材料之前和之后填写了一份匿名问卷。计算了可读性和可理解性频率。参与者的平均年龄为59.1±15.1(标准差)岁(范围19 - 81岁),62%为女性。其中26%未接受过教育,30%为“小学”学历,28%为“中学”学历,14%拥有“学位”。根据可读性得分,该手册对于所有小学毕业的人来说都是“可读的”。在100名参与者中,40%的人认为手册的语言“简单”或“非常简单”,46%认为“足够简单”,14%认为外行人理解起来“困难”。其中94%的人在文本中未发现难以理解的词汇。不同教育水平之间没有差异。读者阅读手册后的回答更正确。预测试显示,61±26%的读者正确回答了可理解性问题。阅读手册后,81±17%的人给出了正确答案。知识的前后净增加量为+20%(95%置信区间+8至+32%)。该手册是在当地居民的帮助下采用网络策略设计和编写的。结果发现它易于阅读且相当清晰。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of easy-to-read information material on healthy life-styles written with the help of citizens' collaboration through networking.对通过网络借助公民协作编写的关于健康生活方式的易读信息材料的评估。
Promot Educ. 2006;13(3):191-6.
2
Assessment of readability and learning of easy-to-read educational health materials designed and written with the help of citizens by means of two non-alternative methods.通过两种非替代方法对在公民帮助下设计和编写的易读教育健康材料的可读性和学习情况进行评估。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2006 May;11(2):123-32. doi: 10.1007/s10459-005-7852-2.
3
Readability of American Cancer Society patient education literature.美国癌症协会患者教育文献的可读性。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 1992 Jan-Feb;19(1):51-5.
4
The SOL formulas for converting SMOG readability scores between health education materials written in Spanish, English, and French.用于在西班牙语、英语和法语编写的健康教育材料之间转换烟雾可读性分数的SOL公式。
J Health Commun. 1999 Jan-Mar;4(1):21-9. doi: 10.1080/108107399127066.
5
American Academy of Family Physicians patient education materials: can patients read them?美国家庭医师学会患者教育资料:患者能读懂吗?
Fam Med. 2004 Sep;36(8):571-4.
6
Readability of written materials: implications for critical care nurses.书面材料的可读性:对重症监护护士的影响
Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 1995 Nov-Dec;14(6):328-34.
7
The use of illustrations and narrative text style to improve readability of a health education brochure.运用插图和叙事文本风格提高健康教育手册的可读性。
J Cancer Educ. 1992;7(3):251-60. doi: 10.1080/08858199209528176.
8
Written educational materials for families of chronically ill children.为慢性病患儿家庭编写的教育材料。
J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2007 Sep;19(9):471-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2007.00254.x.
9
Drug labels: are they a readable material?药品标签:它们是易读材料吗?
Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Oct;73(1):141-5. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.05.004. Epub 2008 Jun 24.
10
Literacy: a problem that managers must handle.读写能力:管理者必须应对的一个问题。
Hosp Mater Manage Q. 1998 Aug;20(1):37-47.

引用本文的文献

1
Easy to Read Health Education Material Improves Oral Health Literacy of Older Adults in Rural Community-Based Care Centers: A Quasi-Experimental Study.易读的健康教育材料提高农村社区护理中心老年人的口腔健康素养:一项准实验研究。
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Oct 29;9(11):1465. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9111465.