Iacoviello Brian M, McCarthy Kevin Scott, Barrett Marna S, Rynn Moira, Gallop Robert, Barber Jacques P
Department of Psychiatry, Center for Psychotherapy Research, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104-3309, USA.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2007 Feb;75(1):194-8. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.75.1.194.
The influence of treatment preferences on the development of the therapeutic alliance was investigated. Seventy-five patients were followed while participating in a randomized controlled trial comparing supportive-expressive psychotherapy with sertraline or pill placebo in the treatment of major depressive disorder. Therapeutic alliance was assessed before treatment and at the 3rd, 5th, and 9th weeks of treatment. Among patients initially preferring psychotherapy, those receiving psychotherapy experienced increases in their alliance over time, whereas those receiving active medication or placebo experienced decreases. Among patients preferring pharmacotherapy, there were no differences in alliance development whether they received psychotherapy, active medication, or placebo. These relations were observed even when controlling for symptom severity. Thus, the congruence of patients' treatment preference and the treatment that they ultimately received influenced the development of the therapeutic alliance. Because alliance is a robust predictor of outcome, treatment preferences may need to be carefully considered in randomized controlled trial settings.
研究了治疗偏好对治疗联盟发展的影响。75名患者参与了一项随机对照试验,该试验比较了支持性表达心理治疗与舍曲林或药丸安慰剂在治疗重度抑郁症中的效果。在治疗前以及治疗的第3周、第5周和第9周对治疗联盟进行评估。在最初倾向于心理治疗的患者中,接受心理治疗的患者其联盟随着时间的推移有所增加,而接受活性药物或安慰剂治疗的患者则有所下降。在倾向于药物治疗的患者中,无论他们接受心理治疗、活性药物还是安慰剂,联盟发展情况均无差异。即使在控制症状严重程度的情况下,也观察到了这些关系。因此,患者的治疗偏好与他们最终接受的治疗之间的一致性影响了治疗联盟的发展。由于联盟是治疗结果的有力预测指标,在随机对照试验环境中可能需要仔细考虑治疗偏好。