• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

父母对育儿干预措施的交付形式和项目特点的偏好概况。

Profiles of Parents' Preferences for Delivery Formats and Program Features of Parenting Interventions.

作者信息

Gonzalez Carolina, Morawska Alina, Haslam Divna M

机构信息

Parenting and Family Support Centre, School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.

, 13 Upland Road, St. Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia.

出版信息

Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2023 Jun;54(3):770-785. doi: 10.1007/s10578-021-01284-6. Epub 2021 Nov 22.

DOI:10.1007/s10578-021-01284-6
PMID:34811626
Abstract

Parents are the targeted consumers of parenting interventions but a small body of research has examined parental preferences for program characteristics to incorporate them in the adaptation and implementation of such programs. Furthermore, the relationship between parents' preferences for program characteristics and their cognitions and behaviours has not yet been explored. This study aimed to identify profiles of parental preferences for delivery formats and program features of parenting interventions. Data from 6949 participants from the International Parenting Survey was analysed. Two-step cluster analyses were conducted to determine clusters of delivery formats and program features of parenting interventions. Preferences for delivery formats showed two clusters, a face-to-face cluster and a media-based cluster. In terms of program features, two clusters were also obtained, a personalised cluster and logistic cluster. While these clusters differed in some demographics, parents' report of child emotional and behavioural problems and parent factors were the key differentiating variables.

摘要

父母是育儿干预措施的目标消费者,但仅有少量研究考察了父母对于项目特征的偏好,以便将这些偏好纳入此类项目的调整和实施过程中。此外,父母对项目特征的偏好与他们的认知及行为之间的关系尚未得到探究。本研究旨在确定父母对于育儿干预措施的提供形式和项目特征的偏好概况。对来自国际育儿调查的6949名参与者的数据进行了分析。进行了两步聚类分析,以确定育儿干预措施的提供形式和项目特征的类别。对提供形式的偏好显示出两个类别,一个是面对面类别,另一个是基于媒体的类别。在项目特征方面,也得到了两个类别,一个是个性化类别和后勤类别。虽然这些类别在一些人口统计学特征上存在差异,但父母对孩子情绪和行为问题的报告以及父母因素是关键的区分变量。

相似文献

1
Profiles of Parents' Preferences for Delivery Formats and Program Features of Parenting Interventions.父母对育儿干预措施的交付形式和项目特点的偏好概况。
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2023 Jun;54(3):770-785. doi: 10.1007/s10578-021-01284-6. Epub 2021 Nov 22.
2
Using consumer preference information to increase the reach and impact of media-based parenting interventions in a public health approach to parenting support.利用消费者偏好信息,以公共卫生的方式支持育儿,增加基于媒体的育儿干预措施的覆盖范围和影响力。
Behav Ther. 2012 Jun;43(2):257-70. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2011.05.004. Epub 2011 Jun 1.
3
Relative Efficacy of Internet-based and Face-to-face Behavioural Parent Training for Parents of Children with Attention-deficit/ hyperactivity disorder: a Non-randomised Controlled Trial.基于互联网与面对面行为家长培训对注意力缺陷/多动障碍儿童家长的相对疗效:一项非随机对照试验
Neuropsychopharmacol Hung. 2024 Dec;26(4):204-217.
4
Practitioner perceptions of the use of the Triple P - Positive Parenting Program with families from culturally diverse backgrounds.从业者对“积极育儿计划三原则(Triple P)”在文化背景多样家庭中的应用的看法。
Aust J Prim Health. 2012;18(4):313-20. doi: 10.1071/PY11106.
5
"Since his birth, I've always been old" the experience of being parents to children displaying disruptive behavior problems: a qualitative study.从孩子出生起,我就已经老了:父母应对子女具有破坏性行为问题的体验:一项定性研究。
BMC Psychol. 2020 Sep 22;8(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s40359-020-00465-7.
6
Mindfulness-enhanced parenting programmes for improving the psychosocial outcomes of children (0 to 18 years) and their parents.正念强化育儿计划对改善儿童(0至18岁)及其父母的心理社会结局的作用
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 10;1(1):CD012445. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012445.pub2.
7
Parents' Consumer Preferences for Early Childhood Behavioral Intervention in Primary Care.父母对初级保健中幼儿行为干预的消费者偏好。
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2019 Dec;40(9):669-678. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000000736.
8
A Model of Intention to Participate in Parenting Interventions: The Role of Parent Cognitions and Behaviors.参与育儿干预的意向模型:父母认知和行为的作用。
Behav Ther. 2021 May;52(3):761-773. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2020.09.006. Epub 2020 Oct 24.
9
Treatment of child externalizing behavior problems: a comprehensive review and meta-meta-analysis on effects of parent-based interventions on parental characteristics.儿童外化行为问题的治疗:基于父母的干预对父母特征影响的综合回顾和元分析
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2019 Aug;28(8):1025-1036. doi: 10.1007/s00787-018-1175-3. Epub 2018 Jun 8.
10
Web-Based Parent Training Intervention With Telephone Coaching for Disruptive Behavior in 4-Year-Old Children in Real-World Practice: Implementation Study.基于网络的家长培训干预措施结合电话指导用于现实生活中4岁儿童破坏性行为的研究:实施性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Apr 11;21(4):e11446. doi: 10.2196/11446.

引用本文的文献

1
Post-Adoption Help-Seeking in Portugal: A Comprehensive Study on Parental Difficulties and Help-Seeking Behaviors and Perceptions.葡萄牙收养后的求助行为:父母困难、求助行为和认知的综合研究
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 8;19(18):11283. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191811283.

本文引用的文献

1
A Model of Intention to Participate in Parenting Interventions: The Role of Parent Cognitions and Behaviors.参与育儿干预的意向模型:父母认知和行为的作用。
Behav Ther. 2021 May;52(3):761-773. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2020.09.006. Epub 2020 Oct 24.
2
Do Parent Preferences for Child Conduct Problem Interventions Impact Parenting Outcomes? A Pilot Study in Community Children's Mental Health Settings.父母对儿童行为问题干预措施的偏好会影响养育结果吗?社区儿童心理健康环境中的一项试点研究。
J Marital Fam Ther. 2018 Oct;44(4):716-729. doi: 10.1111/jmft.12310. Epub 2018 Feb 9.
3
Engagement in Behavioral Parent Training: Review of the Literature and Implications for Practice.
参与行为父母培训:文献综述及实践启示
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2016 Sep;19(3):204-15. doi: 10.1007/s10567-016-0205-2.
4
Social media and gamification: Engaging vulnerable parents in an online evidence-based parenting program.社交媒体与游戏化:让弱势父母参与在线循证育儿项目
Child Abuse Negl. 2016 Mar;53:95-107. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.10.031. Epub 2016 Feb 12.
5
Examining Parents' Preferences for Group and Individual Parent Training for Children with ADHD Symptoms.考察父母对患有多动症症状儿童的团体和个体家长培训的偏好。
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2016 Sep-Oct;45(5):614-631. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2015.1004678. Epub 2015 Feb 20.
6
Working together to solve disparities: Latina/o parents' contributions to the adaptation of a preventive intervention for childhood conduct problems.携手解决差异问题:拉丁裔父母对儿童行为问题预防性干预措施适应性调整的贡献
Psychol Serv. 2014 Nov;11(4):410-20. doi: 10.1037/a0036200.
7
The Triple P-Positive Parenting Program: a systematic review and meta-analysis of a multi-level system of parenting support.三重 P 正向育儿计划:多层次育儿支持系统的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2014 Jun;34(4):337-57. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2014.04.003. Epub 2014 Apr 26.
8
Parenting and Family Adjustment Scales (PAFAS): validation of a brief parent-report measure for use in assessment of parenting skills and family relationships.育儿与家庭适应量表(PAFAS):一种用于评估育儿技能和家庭关系的简短家长报告测量工具的效度验证
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2014 Jun;45(3):255-72. doi: 10.1007/s10578-013-0397-3.
9
Facilitators and barriers to engagement in parenting programs: a qualitative systematic review.参与育儿项目的促进因素和障碍:一项定性系统评价
Health Educ Behav. 2014 Apr;41(2):127-37. doi: 10.1177/1090198113485755. Epub 2013 May 2.
10
Improving positive parenting skills and reducing harsh and abusive parenting in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.改善中低收入国家积极育儿技能和减少严厉及虐待性育儿方式:系统评价。
Prev Sci. 2013 Aug;14(4):352-63. doi: 10.1007/s11121-012-0314-1.