Gil-Olarte Márquez Paloma, Palomera Martín Raquel, Brackett Marc A
University of Cádiz, Spain.
Psicothema. 2006;18 Suppl:118-23.
This study investigated the discriminant, criterion and incremental validity of an ability measure of Emotional Intelligence (EI). High school students (N = 77) took the Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test - Spanish Version (MSCEIT V. 2.0, 2002), a measure of Big Five personality traits (BFQ; Caprara, Barbanelli, & Borgogni , 1993), an General Intelligence test (IGF-r 5; Yuste, 2002), and a social competence inventory (AECS; Moraleda, González, & García-Gallo, 1998). Students' academic grades also were obtained from official school records at the end of the school year. As predicted, the MSCEIT was discriminable from well-established measures of personality and intelligence. The test was also moderately related to social competence and predicted students' final grades. Most of the findings remained significant after personality and academic intelligence were statistically controlled. The potential utility of EI in the context of academic institutions is discussed.
本研究调查了情商(EI)能力测量的区分效度、效标效度和增量效度。高中生(N = 77)参加了梅耶-萨洛维-卡鲁索情商测试 - 西班牙语版(MSCEIT V. 2.0,2002)、大五人格特质测量(BFQ;卡普拉拉、巴尔巴内利和博尔戈尼,1993)、一般智力测试(IGF-r 5;尤斯特,2002)以及社交能力量表(AECS;莫拉莱达、冈萨雷斯和加西亚-加洛,1998)。学生的学业成绩也从学年末的官方学校记录中获取。正如所预测的那样,MSCEIT与成熟的人格和智力测量方法有明显区别。该测试也与社交能力适度相关,并能预测学生的期末成绩。在对人格和学业智力进行统计控制后,大多数研究结果仍然显著。文中讨论了EI在学术机构背景下的潜在效用。