• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年肿瘤学临床活动的组织:国际老年肿瘤学会(SIOG)特别工作组报告

Organization of the clinical activity of geriatric oncology: report of a SIOG (International Society of Geriatric Oncology) task force.

作者信息

Monfardini Silvio, Aapro M S, Bennett J M, Mori M, Regenstreif D, Rodin M, Stein B, Zulian G B, Droz J P

机构信息

Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto Oncologico Veneto, via Gattamelata 64, 35128 Padova, Italy.

出版信息

Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2007 Apr;62(1):62-73. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2006.10.003. Epub 2007 Feb 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2006.10.003
PMID:17300950
Abstract

Management for elderly cancer patients world wide is far from being optimal and few older patients are entering clinical trials. A SIOG Task Force was therefore activated to analyze how the clinical activity of Geriatric Oncology is organized. A structured questionnaire was circulated among the SIOG Members. Fifty eight answers were received. All respondents identified Geriatric Oncology, as an area of specialization, however the organization of the clinical activity was variable. Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) was performed in 60% of cases. A Geriatric Oncology Program (GOP) was identified in 21 centers, 85% located in Oncology and 15% in Geriatric Departments. In the majority of GOP scheduled case discussion conferences dedicated to elderly cancer patients took regular place, the composition of the multidisciplinary team involved in the GOP activity included Medical Oncologists, Geriatricians, Nurses, Pharmacists, Social Workers. Fellowships in Geriatric Oncology were present in almost half of GOPs. Over 60% of respondents were willing to recruit patients over 70 years in clinical trials, while the proportion of cases included was only 20%. Enrolment in clinical trials was perceived as more difficult by 52% and much more difficult in 12% of the respondents. In conclusion, a better organization of the clinical activity in Geriatric Oncology allows a better clinical practice and an optimal clinical research. The GOP which can be set up in the oncological as well as in the geriatric environment thought a multidisciplinary coordinator effort. Future plans should also concentrate on divisions, units or departments of Geriatric Oncology.

摘要

全球老年癌症患者的管理远未达到最佳状态,很少有老年患者参与临床试验。因此,国际老年肿瘤学会(SIOG)启动了一个特别工作组来分析老年肿瘤学的临床活动是如何组织的。一份结构化问卷在SIOG成员中进行了分发。共收到58份回复。所有受访者都将老年肿瘤学视为一个专业领域,然而临床活动的组织方式各不相同。60%的病例进行了综合老年评估(CGA)。在21个中心确定了老年肿瘤学项目(GOP),其中85%位于肿瘤科,15%位于老年科。在大多数GOP中,定期举行专门针对老年癌症患者的病例讨论会,参与GOP活动的多学科团队成员包括医学肿瘤学家、老年病学家、护士、药剂师、社会工作者。几乎一半的GOP设有老年肿瘤学奖学金。超过60%的受访者愿意招募70岁以上的患者参加临床试验,而实际纳入的病例比例仅为20%。52%的受访者认为临床试验的入组比较困难,12%的受访者认为非常困难。总之,更好地组织老年肿瘤学的临床活动有助于改善临床实践和优化临床研究。通过多学科协调努力,可以在肿瘤学和老年医学环境中设立GOP。未来的计划也应集中在老年肿瘤学的科室、单元或部门。

相似文献

1
Organization of the clinical activity of geriatric oncology: report of a SIOG (International Society of Geriatric Oncology) task force.老年肿瘤学临床活动的组织:国际老年肿瘤学会(SIOG)特别工作组报告
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2007 Apr;62(1):62-73. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2006.10.003. Epub 2007 Feb 14.
2
The surgical management of elderly cancer patients; recommendations of the SIOG surgical task force.老年癌症患者的外科治疗;国际老年肿瘤学会外科特别工作组的建议
Eur J Cancer. 2004 May;40(7):926-38. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2004.01.016.
3
[What's new in geriatric oncology?].老年肿瘤学有哪些新进展?
Bull Cancer. 2006 Jan;93(1):119-23.
4
Use of comprehensive geriatric assessment in older cancer patients: recommendations from the task force on CGA of the International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG).老年癌症患者综合老年评估的应用:国际老年肿瘤学会(SIOG)综合老年评估特别工作组的建议
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2005 Sep;55(3):241-52. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2005.06.003.
5
Taking care of older cancer patients: results of a survey addressed to the Chiefs of the Medical Oncology Divisions in Italy.关爱老年癌症患者:一项针对意大利肿瘤内科主任的调查结果
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2006 Apr;58(1):53-9. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2005.08.004. Epub 2006 Mar 13.
6
[Geriatric assessment in the oncology setting].[肿瘤学环境中的老年评估]
Bull Cancer. 2008 May 28;95 FMC Onco:F16-20. doi: 10.1684/bdc.2007.0546.
7
International Society of Geriatric Oncology Chemotherapy Taskforce: evaluation of chemotherapy in older patients--an analysis of the medical literature.国际老年肿瘤学会化疗特别工作组:老年患者化疗评估——医学文献分析
J Clin Oncol. 2007 May 10;25(14):1832-43. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.10.6583.
8
Comprehensive geriatric assessment basics for the cancer professional.癌症专业人员的综合老年医学评估基础
J Oncol Manag. 2003 Mar-Apr;12(2):13-7.
9
Comprehensive geriatric assessment for older patients with cancer.老年癌症患者的综合老年评估
J Clin Oncol. 2007 May 10;25(14):1824-31. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.10.6559.
10
Identifying vulnerable older adults with cancer: integrating geriatric assessment into oncology practice.识别患有癌症的脆弱老年人:将老年评估纳入肿瘤学实践。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007 Oct;55(10):1604-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01367.x. Epub 2007 Aug 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Models of Care in Geriatric Oncology.老年肿瘤学的照护模式
J Clin Oncol. 2021 Jul 1;39(19):2195-2204. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.00118. Epub 2021 May 27.
2
The Multidisciplinary Team (MDT) Approach and Quality of Care.多学科团队(MDT)方法与医疗质量。
Front Oncol. 2020 Mar 20;10:85. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00085. eCollection 2020.
3
Comprehensive geriatric assessment and decision-making in older men with incurable but manageable (chronic) cancer.老年男性不可治愈但可管理(慢性)癌症的全面老年评估和决策。
Support Care Cancer. 2019 May;27(5):1755-1763. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4410-z. Epub 2018 Aug 25.
4
Trends in Aging-Related Services During Nephrectomy: Implications for Surgery in an Aging Population.肾切除术期间与衰老相关服务的趋势:对老年人群手术的影响。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017 Oct;65(10):2290-2296. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15046. Epub 2017 Aug 11.
5
Integrated oncogeriatric approach: a systematic review of the literature using concept analysis.综合肿瘤老年病学方法:使用概念分析的文献系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2012 Dec 5;2(6). doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001483. Print 2012.