Clavering Emma K, McLaughlin Janice
University of Newcastle, United Kingdom.
Qual Health Res. 2007 Mar;17(3):400-10. doi: 10.1177/1049732306298380.
Focus groups are an important element of qualitative health research, valued for the forms of knowledge and understanding that emerge from interactions among participants. Common advice for focus groups within health research is to limit the level of variation among respondents to generate comprehensive discussion and shared knowledge. In this article, the authors critically examine this advice, proposing instead that it is useful to acknowledge and, at times, consciously build in heterogeneity across categories of those present. The benefit of doing this is that the interaction thus generated can be used as a space within which to explore differing professional positions and interpretations of issues under discussion. Using research they have done, they explore the practical issues involved in getting different health and social care professionals together and go on to discuss the value and significance of using focus groups to explore the production of professional hierarchies and boundaries.
焦点小组是定性健康研究的一个重要元素,因其能从参与者之间的互动中产生知识和理解形式而受到重视。健康研究中关于焦点小组的常见建议是限制受访者之间的差异程度,以进行全面的讨论并产生共享知识。在本文中,作者批判性地审视了这一建议,转而提出承认并有时有意识地在在场人员类别中构建异质性是有用的。这样做的好处是,由此产生的互动可以用作一个空间,在其中探索不同专业立场以及对所讨论问题的不同解释。作者利用他们所做的研究,探讨了将不同的健康和社会护理专业人员聚集在一起所涉及的实际问题,并进而讨论了使用焦点小组来探索专业等级制度和界限的产生的价值和意义。