用于血压测量的海涅伽马G7(G5)和XXL-LF无液装置的验证。

Validation of Heine Gamma G7 (G5) and XXL-LF aneroid devices for blood pressure measurement.

作者信息

Dorigatti Francesca, Bonso Elisa, Zanier Ada, Palatini Paolo

机构信息

Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Padova, Padua, Italy.

出版信息

Blood Press Monit. 2007 Feb;12(1):29-33. doi: 10.1097/01.mbp.0000217997.19839.39.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the accuracy of the Gamma G7 (and G5 model) and XXL-LF aneroid sphygmomanometers developed by the Heine Company.

DESIGN

Device evaluations were performed using the new protocol of the European Society of Hypertension. Monitor performance was assessed in relation to participants' sex, age, arm circumference, and systolic and diastolic blood pressures.

METHODS

The two sphygmomanometers were assessed in two different samples according to European Society of Hypertension requirements, which are based on four zones of accuracy differing from the mercury standard by 5, 10, 15 mmHg, or more.

RESULTS

Both sphygmomanometers passed all three phases of the protocol for systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure. Mean blood pressure difference between Gamma G7 sphygmomanometer and observers was -0.4+/-3.3 mmHg for systolic blood pressure and -0.5+/-2.6 mmHg for diastolic blood pressure. Mean differences for the Gamma XXL-LF sphygmomanometer were -0.3+/-3.7 and -1.0+/-2.6 mmHg, respectively. In multivariable analyses, the SBP discrepancies between both aneroid sphygmomanometers and observers were unrelated to age, sex, arm circumference and systolic blood pressure. For diastolic blood pressure, a borderline relationship was found only for arm circumference (P=0.057) with the Gamma G7 device.

CONCLUSIONS

These data show that the Heine Gamma G7 and Gamma XXL-LF aneroid sphygmomanometers satisfy the new recommended ESH accuracy levels for both SBP and DBP. Their performance is uniform across subgroups of participants with different clinical characteristics.

摘要

目的

确定海涅公司生产的伽马G7(及G5型号)和XXL-LF无液血压计的准确性。

设计

采用欧洲高血压学会的新方案进行设备评估。根据参与者的性别、年龄、上臂周长以及收缩压和舒张压评估监测性能。

方法

根据欧洲高血压学会的要求,在两个不同样本中对这两种无液血压计进行评估,该要求基于与汞标准相差5、10、15 mmHg或更多的四个准确度区域。

结果

两种无液血压计在收缩压和舒张压方案的所有三个阶段均通过。伽马G7无液血压计与观察者之间收缩压的平均血压差值为-0.4±3.3 mmHg,舒张压为-0.5±2.6 mmHg。伽马XXL-LF无液血压计的平均差值分别为-0.3±3.7和-1.0±2.6 mmHg。在多变量分析中,两种无液血压计与观察者之间的收缩压差异与年龄、性别、上臂周长和收缩压无关。对于舒张压,仅在伽马G7设备中发现与上臂周长存在临界关系(P = 0.057)。

结论

这些数据表明,海涅伽马G7和伽马XXL-LF无液血压计满足欧洲高血压学会对收缩压和舒张压新推荐的准确度水平。它们在具有不同临床特征的参与者亚组中的性能是一致的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索