Manheimer Eric, Lim Byungmook, Lao Lixing, Berman Brian
University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21207, USA.
Acupunct Med. 2006 Dec;24 Suppl:S7-14. doi: 10.1136/aim.24.suppl.7.
Evidence on the efficacy of acupuncture for reducing the pain and dysfunction of osteoarthritis is equivocal.
To determine whether acupuncture provides greater pain relief and improved function compared with sham acupuncture or education in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee.
Randomised, controlled trial.
Two outpatient clinics (an integrative medicine facility and a rheumatology facility) located in academic teaching hospitals and one clinical trials facility.
570 patients with osteoarthritis of the knee (mean age [+/-SD], 65.5 +/- 8.4 years).
23 true acupuncture sessions over 26 weeks. Controls received 6 two-hour sessions over 12 weeks or 23 sham acupuncture sessions over 26 weeks.
Primary outcomes were changes in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain and function scores at 8 and 26 weeks. Secondary outcomes were patient global assessment, 6-minute walk distance, and physical health scores of the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36).
Participants in the true acupuncture group experienced greater improvement in WOMAC function scores than the sham acupuncture group at 8 weeks (mean difference, -2.9 [95% CI, -5.0 to -0.8]; P=0.01) but not in WOMAC pain score (mean difference, -0.5 [CI, -1.2 to 0.2]; P=0.18) or the patient global assessment (mean difference, 0.16 [CI, -0.02 to 0.34]; P> 0.2). At 26 weeks, the true acupuncture group experienced significantly greater improvement than the sham group in the WOMAC function score (mean difference, -2.5 [CI, -4.7 to -0.4]; P=0.01), WOMAC pain score (mean difference, -0.87 [CI, -1.58 to -0.16]; P=0.003), and patient global assessment (mean difference, 0.26 [CI, 0.07 to 0.45]; P=0.02).
At 26 weeks, 43% of the participants in the education group and 25% in each of the true and sham acupuncture groups were not available for analysis.
Acupuncture seems to provide improvement in function and pain relief as an adjunctive therapy for osteoarthritis of the knee when compared with credible sham acupuncture and education control groups.
关于针灸减轻骨关节炎疼痛和功能障碍疗效的证据并不明确。
确定与假针灸或健康教育相比,针灸是否能为膝骨关节炎患者提供更大程度的疼痛缓解和功能改善。
随机对照试验。
位于学术教学医院的两家门诊诊所(一家中西医结合机构和一家风湿病机构)以及一家临床试验机构。
570例膝骨关节炎患者(平均年龄[±标准差],65.5±8.4岁)。
在26周内进行23次真针灸治疗。对照组在12周内接受6次两小时的治疗或在26周内接受23次假针灸治疗。
主要结局指标为8周和26周时西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)疼痛和功能评分的变化。次要结局指标为患者总体评估、6分钟步行距离以及36项简短健康调查(SF-36)的身体健康评分。
真针灸组在8周时WOMAC功能评分的改善程度大于假针灸组(平均差值,-2.9[95%CI,-5.0至-0.8];P=0.01),但在WOMAC疼痛评分(平均差值,-0.5[CI,-1.2至0.2];P=0.18)或患者总体评估(平均差值,0.16[CI,-0.02至0.34];P>0.2)方面无差异。在26周时,真针灸组在WOMAC功能评分(平均差值,-2.5[CI,-4.7至-0.4];P=0.01)、WOMAC疼痛评分(平均差值,-0.87[CI,-1.58至-0.16];P=0.003)和患者总体评估(平均差值,0.26[CI,0.07至0.45];P=0.02)方面的改善程度明显大于假针灸组。
在26周时,教育组43%的参与者以及真针灸组和假针灸组各25%的参与者无法纳入分析。
与可信的假针灸和健康教育对照组相比,针灸作为膝骨关节炎的辅助治疗似乎能改善功能并缓解疼痛。