Cunningham James K, Saleh Ahlam A
Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.
Health Sciences Library, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.
Alcohol Res. 2024 Dec 18;44(1):08. doi: 10.35946/arcr.v44.1.08. eCollection 2024.
Most research on the structural determinants of substance use and mental health has centered around widely studied factors such as alcohol taxes, tobacco control policies, essential/precursor chemical regulations, neighborhood/city characteristics, and immigration policies. Other structural determinants exist, however, many of which are being identified in the emerging fields of structural stigma, structural racism, and structural sexism. This narrative review surveys the measures and designs used in substance use and mental health studies from these three fields.
The PubMed, PsycINFO, and Scopus databases were searched on May 11, 2023. A focused search approach used terminology for structural racism, stigma, or sexism combined with terminology for substance use or mental health. Peer-reviewed studies were included if they were written in English and assessed associations between objective structural measures and substance use and mental health outcomes.
Of 2,536 studies identified, 2,487 were excluded. Forty-nine studies (30 related to stigma, 16 related to racism, and three related to sexism) met the inclusion criteria. Information was abstracted about the structural measures, outcome measures, research design, sample, and findings of each study.
The structural determinant measures used in the studies reviewed were diverse. They addressed, for example, community opinions, the gender of legislators, economic vulnerability, financial loan discrimination, college policies, law enforcement, historical trauma, and legislative protections for sexual and gender minorities and for reproductive rights. Most of the structural determinant measures were constructed by combining multiple indicators into indexes or by merging indexes into composite indexes, although some studies relied on single indicators alone. The substance use and mental health outcome measures most frequently examined were related to alcohol and depression, respectively. The studies were conducted in numerous nations and drew samples from an array of groups, including, for example, patients who experienced overdoses from substance use, sexual and gender minorities, racial and ethnic minority groups, women, youth, migrants, and patients subject to involuntary psychiatric hospitalization. Most of the studies used passive-observational (correlational) research designs and, as a result, did not assess whether their structural determinant variables were causally related to substance use and mental health. Nevertheless, the studies reviewed can be used by public health proponents to foster awareness that a wide range of structural determinants correlate with the substance use and mental health of many groups within and across nations.
大多数关于物质使用和心理健康的结构决定因素的研究都集中在广泛研究的因素上,如酒精税、烟草控制政策、基本/前体化学品法规、社区/城市特征和移民政策。然而,还存在其他结构决定因素,其中许多正在结构污名、结构种族主义和结构性别歧视等新兴领域中被识别出来。本叙述性综述调查了这三个领域在物质使用和心理健康研究中使用的测量方法和设计。
于2023年5月11日在PubMed、PsycINFO和Scopus数据库中进行搜索。采用聚焦搜索方法,使用结构种族主义、污名或性别歧视的术语与物质使用或心理健康的术语相结合。如果同行评审研究是用英文撰写的,并评估了客观结构测量与物质使用和心理健康结果之间的关联,则将其纳入。
在识别出的2536项研究中,排除了2487项。49项研究(30项与污名有关,16项与种族主义有关,3项与性别歧视有关)符合纳入标准。提取了每项研究的结构测量、结果测量、研究设计、样本和研究结果的信息。
所审查研究中使用的结构决定因素测量方法多种多样。例如,它们涉及社区意见、立法者的性别、经济脆弱性、金融贷款歧视、大学政策、执法、历史创伤以及对性少数群体和性别少数群体以及生殖权利的立法保护。大多数结构决定因素测量是通过将多个指标组合成指数或将指数合并成综合指数构建的,尽管一些研究仅依赖单一指标。最常研究的物质使用和心理健康结果测量分别与酒精和抑郁症有关。这些研究在许多国家进行,并从一系列群体中抽取样本,包括例如因物质使用过量的患者、性少数群体和性别少数群体、种族和族裔少数群体、妇女、青年、移民以及非自愿接受精神科住院治疗的患者。大多数研究采用被动观察(相关性)研究设计,因此没有评估其结构决定因素变量是否与物质使用和心理健康存在因果关系。尽管如此,公共卫生支持者可以利用所审查的研究,以提高人们对广泛的结构决定因素与许多国家内部和跨国许多群体的物质使用和心理健康相关的认识。