Charlson Mary E, Mittleman Ilana, Ramos Rosio, Cassells Andrea, Lin T J, Eggleston Alice, Wells Martin T, Hollenberg James, Pirraglia Paul, Winston Ginger, Tobin Jonathan N
Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, 1300 York Ave, New York, NY 10021, USA.
Clinical Directors Network (CDN), 5 West 37(th) Street, 10(th) Floor, New York, NY 10018, USA.
Contemp Clin Trials. 2025 May;152:107865. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2025.107865. Epub 2025 Feb 28.
This paper describes an innovative cluster randomized controlled trial design to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of two approaches to preventing significant destabilization, leading to unplanned hospitalization and increased disability for patients with high comorbidity, that is, multiple chronic diseases defined by an enhanced Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥4.
A total of 1974 patients were randomized in four waves at each of the sixteen Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) in four health systems -two in New York and two in Chicago. The two interventions compared 1) Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH) as implemented by the FQHCs (usual care control); or 2) PCMH plus a coaching intervention delivered by Health Coaches (experimental) helping patients identify life goals to encourage self-management enhanced by a positive affect/self-affirmation strategy. The two primary patient-centered clinical outcomes are 1) Unplanned hospitalizations; and 2) Within-patient changes in quality of life and disability, as measured by the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Scale 2 (WHODAS 2.0). The hypotheses are: 1) intervention patients will have a 5 % relative reduction in unplanned hospitalizations as compared to control patients; and 2) reduced disability measured by WHODAS2.0; 3) destabilization or 'tipping points' leading to hospitalization will be more often triggered by psychosocial issues than by medical Issues.
This cluster RCT has the potential to transform the care for patients with high comorbidity by helping motivate patients to engage in self-management and to successfully navigate the barriers, challenges, and stresses leading to destabilization, hospitalization, and increased disability.
gov registration number: NCT04176510.
本文描述了一种创新的整群随机对照试验设计,以评估两种预防严重失稳的方法的比较效果,严重失稳会导致高合并症患者(即由增强的Charlson合并症指数≥4定义的多种慢性病患者)意外住院并增加残疾率。
在四个卫生系统的16个联邦合格健康中心(FQHC)中的每一个,分四批对总共1974名患者进行随机分组,其中两个在纽约,两个在芝加哥。两种干预措施进行比较:1)由FQHC实施的以患者为中心的医疗之家(PCMH)(常规护理对照);或2)PCMH加上由健康教练提供的指导干预(试验组),帮助患者确定生活目标,通过积极情感/自我肯定策略来鼓励自我管理。两个以患者为中心的主要临床结果是:1)意外住院;2)根据世界卫生组织残疾评估量表2(WHODAS 2.0)测量的患者生活质量和残疾状况的内部变化。假设为:1)与对照患者相比,干预组患者的意外住院率将相对降低5%;2)通过WHODAS2.0测量的残疾率降低;3)导致住院的失稳或“临界点”更多是由社会心理问题而非医疗问题引发。
这项整群随机对照试验有可能通过帮助激励患者进行自我管理,并成功克服导致失稳、住院和残疾增加的障碍、挑战和压力,改变对高合并症患者的护理方式。
美国国立医学图书馆临床试验注册中心注册号:NCT04176510。