• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Carotid angioplasty and stenting versus redo endarterectomy for recurrent stenosis.

作者信息

Bettendorf Matthew J, Mansour M Ashraf, Davis Alan T, Sugiyama George T, Cali Robert F, Gorsuch Jill M, Cuff Robert F

机构信息

Grand Rapids Michigan State University General Surgery Program, Grand Rapids Medical Education and Research Center, Grand Rapids, MI, USA.

出版信息

Am J Surg. 2007 Mar;193(3):356-9; discussion 359. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.09.020.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.09.020
PMID:17320534
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Carotid angioplasty and stent (CAS) is an alternative to redo carotid endarterectomy (RCEA) for recurrent carotid stenosis (RCS). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of CAS in the treatment of RCS.

METHODS

In an 8-year period, all patients presenting for treatment of RCS were followed-up prospectively. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify variables associated with unfavorable outcomes.

RESULTS

There were 45 CAS and 46 RCEA procedures performed in 75 patients. One patient in each group suffered a stroke. There were no deaths. The hospital length of stay was significantly shorter for CAS. Secondary recurrence was higher after RCEA (14% vs 6.1%) and failure to take beta-blockers was an independent predictor for multiple recurrences.

CONCLUSIONS

CAS is a safe and effective method to treat patients with RCS and may become the procedure of choice for this disease.

摘要

相似文献

1
Carotid angioplasty and stenting versus redo endarterectomy for recurrent stenosis.
Am J Surg. 2007 Mar;193(3):356-9; discussion 359. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.09.020.
2
Outcomes following extracranial carotid artery stenting in high-risk patients.高危患者颅外颈动脉支架置入术后的结局
J Invasive Cardiol. 2001 May;13(5):375-81.
3
Carotid angioplasty and stenting is a safe and durable procedure in a community hospital.在社区医院,颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术是一种安全且持久有效的手术。
Am Surg. 2007 Jun;73(6):543-6; discussion 546-7.
4
Outcome of carotid artery stenting for primary versus restenotic lesions.原发性病变与再狭窄病变的颈动脉支架置入术结果
Ann Vasc Surg. 2009 May-Jun;23(3):330-4. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2008.05.013. Epub 2008 Aug 9.
5
Carotid artery stenting: do procedural complications relate to the side intervened upon?: results from the Carotid Artery Stent (CAS)-Registry of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitende Kardiologische Krankenhausärzte (ALKK).颈动脉支架置入术:手术并发症与干预侧有关吗?:来自德国心脏病医院协会(ALKK)颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)注册研究的结果
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Jul 1;74(1):1-8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22050.
6
Comparison of in-hospital outcomes of patients with versus without previous carotid endarterectomy undergoing carotid stenting (from the German ALKK CAS Registry).接受颈动脉支架置入术的既往有或无颈动脉内膜切除术患者的院内结局比较(来自德国ALKK CAS注册研究)
Am J Cardiol. 2007 May 1;99(9):1288-93. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.12.047. Epub 2007 Mar 15.
7
Carotid artery angioplasty and stenting: introduction of a new technique into an established vascular surgery center.颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术:将一项新技术引入一家成熟的血管外科中心。
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2009 Apr-May;43(2):144-9. doi: 10.1177/1538574408327571. Epub 2008 Nov 24.
8
Operative intervention for carotid restenosis is safe and effective.对颈动脉再狭窄进行手术干预是安全有效的。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2007 Nov;34(5):561-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2007.06.003. Epub 2007 Aug 6.
9
Staged carotid angioplasty and stenting followed by cardiac surgery in patients with severe asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis: early and long-term results.重度无症状性颈动脉狭窄患者先行分期颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术,随后进行心脏手术:早期和长期结果
Circulation. 2007 Oct 30;116(18):2036-42. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.658625. Epub 2007 Oct 15.
10
Carotid angioplasty with or without stenting versus carotid endarterectomy for carotid artery stenosis: a meta-analysis.颈动脉血管成形术(伴或不伴支架置入)与颈动脉内膜切除术治疗颈动脉狭窄的比较:一项荟萃分析。
J Neurol Sci. 2008 Jul 15;270(1-2):40-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2008.01.012. Epub 2008 Mar 4.

引用本文的文献

1
The management of carotid restenosis: a comprehensive review.颈动脉再狭窄的管理:一项全面综述。
Ann Transl Med. 2020 Oct;8(19):1272. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-963.
2
Risks Associated With Primary and Redo Carotid Endarterectomy in the Endovascular Era.血管内时代初次颈动脉内膜切除术和再次颈动脉内膜切除术的相关风险。
JAMA Surg. 2018 Mar 1;153(3):252-259. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.4477.