• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颈动脉支架置入术:手术并发症与干预侧有关吗?:来自德国心脏病医院协会(ALKK)颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)注册研究的结果

Carotid artery stenting: do procedural complications relate to the side intervened upon?: results from the Carotid Artery Stent (CAS)-Registry of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitende Kardiologische Krankenhausärzte (ALKK).

作者信息

Zahn Ralf, Ischinger Thomas, Hochadel Matthias, Mark Bernd, Zeymer Uwe, Schmalz Wolfgang, Schramm Alexander, Hauptmann Karl Eugen, Seggewiss Hubert, Janicke Ilse, Mudra Harald, Senges Jochen

机构信息

Herzzentrum Ludwigshafen, Kardiologie, Ludwigshafen, Germany.

出版信息

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Jul 1;74(1):1-8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22050.

DOI:10.1002/ccd.22050
PMID:19360877
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine the influence of the side intervened upon on outcomes during carotid artery stenting (CAS).

BACKGROUND

Anatomic and technical aspects may influence the results of CAS. The value of the side intervened upon has not been analyzed yet.

METHODS

We analyzed data from the Carotid Artery Stent (CAS)-Registry.

RESULTS

A total of 3,165 CAS procedures, 1,613 (51%) at the left and 1,552 (49%) at the right carotid artery were included. There was a higher proportion of patients treated for symptomatic stenoses when CAS was performed at the left carotid artery (50.1% versus 45.8%, P = 0.016) and more patients already had prior carotid endarterectomy (8.5% versus 5.8%, P = 0.003). Interventions at the left side took 3 min longer than interventions at the right side (46.6 +/- 24.3 versus 43.8 +/- 23.6, P = 0.003). In patients treated at the left carotid artery amaurosis fugax (0.7% versus 0.1%, P = 0.005), ipsilateral stroke (3.1% versus 1.8%, P = 0.017), and the primary endpoint of in-hospital death or stroke (4.1% versus 2.3%, P = 0.005) occurred significantly more often. Even after adjusting for confounding parameters, CAS procedures performed at the left carotid arteries remained an independent predictor of death or stroke (OR = 1.77, 95% CI: 1.15-2.72, P = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

In current clinical practice, CAS is performed frequently at the right carotid artery as at the left carotid artery. CAS interventions have a higher in-hospital complication rate if performed at the left carotid artery. Technical improvements might help to overcome this situation.

摘要

目的

确定颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)过程中干预侧对手术结果的影响。

背景

解剖学和技术因素可能会影响CAS的结果。然而,干预侧的价值尚未得到分析。

方法

我们分析了来自颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)注册中心的数据。

结果

共纳入3165例CAS手术,其中1613例(51%)在左颈动脉进行,1552例(49%)在右颈动脉进行。在左颈动脉进行CAS时,因症状性狭窄接受治疗的患者比例更高(50.1%对45.8%,P = 0.016),并且已有更多患者接受过颈动脉内膜切除术(8.5%对5.8%,P = 0.003)。左侧的干预操作比右侧长3分钟(46.6±24.3对43.8±23.6,P = 0.003)。在左颈动脉接受治疗的患者中,一过性黑矇(0.7%对0.1%,P = 0.005)、同侧卒中(3.1%对1.8%,P = 0.017)以及院内死亡或卒中的主要终点事件(4.1%对2.3%,P = 0.005)的发生率明显更高。即使在对混杂参数进行校正后,在左颈动脉进行的CAS手术仍然是死亡或卒中的独立预测因素(OR = 1.77,95% CI:1.15 - 2.72,P = 0.009)。

结论

在当前临床实践中,CAS在右颈动脉和左颈动脉的实施频率相近。在左颈动脉进行CAS干预时,院内并发症发生率更高。技术改进可能有助于克服这种情况。

相似文献

1
Carotid artery stenting: do procedural complications relate to the side intervened upon?: results from the Carotid Artery Stent (CAS)-Registry of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitende Kardiologische Krankenhausärzte (ALKK).颈动脉支架置入术:手术并发症与干预侧有关吗?:来自德国心脏病医院协会(ALKK)颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)注册研究的结果
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Jul 1;74(1):1-8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22050.
2
The CAPTURE registry: predictors of outcomes in carotid artery stenting with embolic protection for high surgical risk patients in the early post-approval setting.CAPTURE注册研究:早期批准后使用栓子保护装置对高手术风险患者进行颈动脉支架置入术的预后预测因素。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007 Dec 1;70(7):1025-33. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21359.
3
Intracranial hemorrhage after carotid endarterectomy and carotid stenting in the United States in 2005.2005年美国颈动脉内膜切除术和颈动脉支架置入术后颅内出血情况
J Vasc Surg. 2009 Mar;49(3):623-8; discussion 628-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.09.064.
4
Outcome of carotid artery stenting for primary versus restenotic lesions.原发性病变与再狭窄病变的颈动脉支架置入术结果
Ann Vasc Surg. 2009 May-Jun;23(3):330-4. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2008.05.013. Epub 2008 Aug 9.
5
Risk-adjusted 30-day outcomes of carotid stenting and endarterectomy: results from the SVS Vascular Registry.颈动脉支架置入术和动脉内膜切除术的风险调整后30天结局:来自血管外科学会(SVS)血管登记处的结果
J Vasc Surg. 2009 Jan;49(1):71-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.08.039. Epub 2008 Nov 22.
6
Left versus right carotid artery stenting: is it important?左颈动脉支架置入术与右颈动脉支架置入术:这重要吗?
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Jul 1;74(1):9-10. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22142.
7
Outcomes of carotid artery stenting versus historical surgical controls for radiation-induced carotid stenosis.放射性颈动脉狭窄行颈动脉支架置入术与历史手术对照的结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Mar;53(3):629-36.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.09.056. Epub 2011 Jan 8.
8
Safety and efficacy of carotid stenting in the very elderly.高龄患者颈动脉支架置入术的安全性和有效性。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Apr 1;75(5):651-5. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22345.
9
Comparison of in-hospital outcomes of patients with versus without previous carotid endarterectomy undergoing carotid stenting (from the German ALKK CAS Registry).接受颈动脉支架置入术的既往有或无颈动脉内膜切除术患者的院内结局比较(来自德国ALKK CAS注册研究)
Am J Cardiol. 2007 May 1;99(9):1288-93. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.12.047. Epub 2007 Mar 15.
10
Carotid endarterectomy was performed with lower stroke and death rates than carotid artery stenting in the United States in 2003 and 2004.2003年和2004年在美国,颈动脉内膜切除术的实施带来的中风和死亡率低于颈动脉支架置入术。
J Vasc Surg. 2007 Dec;46(6):1112-1118. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.08.030.

引用本文的文献

1
Peri-interventional neurological complication rates in patients undergoing carotid artery stenting depend on the side of the stenosis treated.接受颈动脉支架置入术患者的围介入期神经并发症发生率取决于所治疗狭窄的部位。
Heart Vessels. 2017 Oct;32(10):1169-1174. doi: 10.1007/s00380-017-0986-3. Epub 2017 May 4.
2
Predictors of minor versus major stroke during carotid artery stenting: results from the carotid artery stenting (CAS) registry of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitende Kardiologische Krankenhausärzte (ALKK).颈动脉支架置入术中小卒中与大卒中之预测因素:来自 Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitende Kardiologische Krankenhausärzte(ALKK)颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)登记处的结果。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2014 May;103(5):345-51. doi: 10.1007/s00392-013-0657-z. Epub 2014 Jan 11.
3
[GeCAS registry. Sense and purpose of a carotid percutaneous transluminal angioplasty register in the era of obligatory quality assurance].[德国颈动脉支架注册研究。在强制质量保证时代颈动脉经皮腔内血管成形术注册研究的意义和目的]
Herz. 2013 Nov;38(7):724-8. doi: 10.1007/s00059-013-3965-1.
4
The role of endovascular expertise in carotid artery stenting: results from the ALKK-CAS-Registry in 5,535 patients.血管内专业知识在颈动脉支架置入术中的作用:来自 5535 例患者的 ALKK-CAS-Registry 研究结果。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2012 Nov;101(11):929-37. doi: 10.1007/s00392-012-0479-4. Epub 2012 May 30.
5
Anticoagulation in neurointerventions: basic pharmacology and pathophysiology, current status, practical advice.神经介入中的抗凝治疗:基础药理学和病理生理学、现状、实用建议。
Clin Neuroradiol. 2012 Mar;22(1):3-13. doi: 10.1007/s00062-012-0133-6. Epub 2012 Feb 7.