Suppr超能文献

比较牙胶尖/AH-Plus和Resilon/Epiphany系统充填根管并采用两种充填技术时的根尖微渗漏情况。

Comparison of apical leakage between canals filled with gutta-percha/AH-Plus and the Resilon/Epiphany System, when submitted to two filling techniques.

作者信息

Veríssimo Denusa Moreira, do Vale Mônica Sampaio, Monteiro André Jalles

机构信息

Specialist in Endodontics and Dental Prosthesis at the Federal University of Ceará, Brazil.

出版信息

J Endod. 2007 Mar;33(3):291-4. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2006.10.014.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the level of apical leakage between canals filled with gutta-percha/AH-Plus (GP) and the Resilon/Epiphany System (RES), when submitted to two filling techniques. Seventy extracted teeth were instrumented and randomly divided into four experimental groups in accordance with the material and techniques used [lateral condensation and Hybrid technique (HT)] and two control groups. After 7 days in an oven (37 degrees C, 100% humidity), the teeth were immersed in India ink and cleared. Leakage was measured by the NIH imageJ program. With respect to the presence of leakage, there was no difference between the filling techniques (p > 0.05), but there was a statistically significant difference when RES was compared with GP (p < 0.05), which leaked more than RES. With RES, leakage was confined to the apical third and HT could be used to thermoplasticize RES with satisfactory results.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较采用两种充填技术时,用牙胶尖/AH Plus(GP)和Resilon/Epiphany系统(RES)充填根管后的根尖微渗漏水平。选取70颗拔除的牙齿进行根管预备,并根据所用材料和技术(侧方加压充填技术和混合技术(HT))随机分为四个实验组和两个对照组。在37℃、湿度100%的烤箱中放置7天后,将牙齿浸入印度墨水中进行透明处理。通过NIH imageJ程序测量微渗漏。就微渗漏的存在而言,充填技术之间没有差异(p>0.05),但将RES与GP进行比较时存在统计学显著差异(p<0.05),GP的微渗漏比RES更多。使用RES时,微渗漏局限于根尖三分之一处,并且HT可用于使RES热塑,效果良好。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验