Shantiaee Yazdan, Maziar Farzin, Dianat Omid, Mahjour Faranak
Department of Endodontics, Dental Research Center, Dental School, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Iran Endod J. 2011 Fall;6(4):140-5. Epub 2011 Nov 15.
Favorable apical seal of root filling materials is a crucial factor for a successful root canal treatment. The aim of this in vitro study was to compare bacterial and dye microleakage of two root canal filling materials including standard gutta-percha and nanosilver coated gutta-percha, and to evaluate the agreement between results of these two methods.
Fifty-eight extracted single-rooted teeth were randomly divided into two experimental groups of 26 each, and two control groups of three each. After decoronation, root canals were instrumented by crown-down technique. Obturation was conducted using standard gutta-percha in one of experimental groups and nanosilver-coated gutta-percha in another group. AH26 sealer was used as the sealer in both experimental groups. Bacterial leakage was investigated after 60 days using Enterococcus (E.) faecalis microbial strains, and dye leakage was assessed during 72 hours using 1% methylene blue. The data were statistically analyzed by Chi-square test, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and Cohen's Kappa.
There was 84% bacterial leakage in standard gutta-percha group and 76% in nanosilver gutta-percha group. Complete dye leakage occurred in 24% and 27% of standard and nanosilver gutta-percha groups, respectively. The above difference between groups was not significant. In the samples with leakage, recorded times of leakage were not significantly different. There was no significant measure of agreement between dye and bacterial penetration along root-end fillings.
There was a poor agreement between dye and bacterial leakage methods. Leakage results produced by nanosilver gutta-percha were comparable to those by standard gutta-percha. Considering the antibacterial effects of nanosilver coated gutta-percha, use of this type of gutta-percha might be more efficacious in endodontic treatments.
根管充填材料良好的根尖封闭是根管治疗成功的关键因素。本体外研究的目的是比较两种根管充填材料(包括标准牙胶和纳米银涂层牙胶)的细菌微渗漏和染料微渗漏,并评估这两种方法结果之间的一致性。
58颗拔除的单根牙随机分为两个实验组,每组26颗,两个对照组,每组3颗。去冠后,采用冠向下技术预备根管。一个实验组使用标准牙胶进行充填,另一组使用纳米银涂层牙胶进行充填。两组实验组均使用AH26封闭剂作为封闭材料。60天后使用粪肠球菌微生物菌株研究细菌渗漏情况,并在72小时内使用1%亚甲蓝评估染料渗漏情况。数据采用卡方检验、Kaplan-Meier生存分析和Cohen's Kappa进行统计学分析。
标准牙胶组细菌渗漏率为84%,纳米银牙胶组为76%。标准牙胶组和纳米银牙胶组分别有24%和27%出现完全染料渗漏。两组之间的上述差异不显著。在有渗漏的样本中,记录的渗漏时间无显著差异。沿根尖充填物的染料和细菌渗透之间没有显著的一致性度量。
染料渗漏和细菌渗漏方法之间的一致性较差。纳米银牙胶产生的渗漏结果与标准牙胶相当。考虑到纳米银涂层牙胶的抗菌作用,在牙髓治疗中使用这种类型的牙胶可能更有效。