• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

准分子原位角膜磨镶术治疗近视的一年临床结果。

One-year clinical results after epi-LASIK for myopia.

作者信息

Katsanevaki Vikentia J, Kalyvianaki Maria I, Kavroulaki Dimitra S, Pallikaris Ioannis G

机构信息

Institute of Vision & Optics, Heraklion, Greece.

出版信息

Ophthalmology. 2007 Jun;114(6):1111-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.08.052. Epub 2007 Feb 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.08.052
PMID:17320960
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the clinical results of epi-LASIK for the treatment of low to moderate myopia and myopic astigmatism.

DESIGN

Retrospective, noncomparative, interventional case series.

PARTICIPANTS

Two hundred thirty-four eyes of 138 patients underwent epi-LASIK for the correction of low to moderate myopia. Mean preoperative spherical equivalent ranged from -1.0 to -7.25 diopters (D) (-3.74+/-1.46, mean+/-standard deviation [SD]) and baseline logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) from 0.10 to -0.18 (mean+/-SD, 0.00+/-0.06).

METHODS

All enrolled eyes underwent epi-LASIK using the Centurion SES epikeratome (Norwood Abbey EyeCare, Victoria, Australia) and the Allegretto (Wavelight Laser Technologie AG, Erlangen, Germany) laser platform. The enrolled patients were followed up daily until the epithelial healing was complete as well as at the 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-month postoperative intervals.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The main parameters assessed were subjective evaluation of postoperative pain, uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) and BSCVA, manifest refraction, haze grade, and contrast sensitivity of the operated eyes.

RESULTS

The mean epithelial healing time was 4.70+/-0.87 days (range, 3-7 days), with mean logMAR UCVA on the day of reepithelization of 0.26+/-0.14 (range, 0.7-0.0). One year after the treatment, the spherical equivalent of the treated eyes (n = 222) ranged from -1.25 to +0.625 D (mean+/-SD, -0.18+/-0.6 D), with 80.33% of the eyes within 0.5 D (96.72% within 1 D) of the attempted correction. At the same interval, 86% of the eyes had clear corneas and 14% clinically insignificant (trace) haze, whereas 60% of the eyes had a line gain of 1 or more lines of BSCVA. Mean logMAR contrast sensitivity of the treated eyes at 4 different spatial frequencies was improved or remained unchanged throughout the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

One-year visual and refractive results after epi-LASIK suggest that it is a safe and efficient method for the correction of low to moderate myopia and myopic astigmatism.

摘要

目的

评估准分子上皮下角膜磨镶术(epi-LASIK)治疗低度至中度近视及近视散光的临床效果。

设计

回顾性、非对照、干预性病例系列研究。

研究对象

138例患者的234只眼接受了epi-LASIK治疗低度至中度近视。术前平均等效球镜度范围为-1.0至-7.25屈光度(D)(-3.74±1.46,平均值±标准差[SD]),最佳矫正视力(BSCVA)的最小分辨角对数(logMAR)基线值为0.10至-0.18(平均值±标准差,0.00±0.06)。

方法

所有纳入的眼睛均使用Centurion SES角膜上皮刀(澳大利亚维多利亚州诺伍德阿比眼科护理公司)和Allegretto(德国埃尔兰根威视光激光技术公司)激光平台进行epi-LASIK手术。对纳入的患者进行每日随访,直至上皮愈合完成,以及术后1、3、6和12个月进行随访。

主要观察指标

评估的主要参数包括对手术眼术后疼痛的主观评价、裸眼视力(UCVA)和BSCVA、显验光、 haze分级以及对比敏感度。

结果

平均上皮愈合时间为4.70±0.87天(范围3 - 7天),上皮重新形成当天的平均logMAR UCVA为0.26±0.14(范围0.7 - 0.0)。治疗后一年,治疗眼(n = 222)的等效球镜度范围为-1.25至+0.625 D(平均值±标准差,-0.18±0.6 D),80.33%的眼睛屈光度在预期矫正值的0.5 D范围内(96.72%在1 D范围内)。在同一时间间隔,86%的眼睛角膜清晰,14%有临床意义不显著(微量)的haze,而60%的眼睛BSCVA提高了1行或更多行。在整个随访期间,治疗眼在4种不同空间频率下的平均logMAR对比敏感度有所提高或保持不变。

结论

epi-LASIK术后一年的视力和屈光结果表明,它是一种治疗低度至中度近视及近视散光的安全有效的方法。

相似文献

1
One-year clinical results after epi-LASIK for myopia.准分子原位角膜磨镶术治疗近视的一年临床结果。
Ophthalmology. 2007 Jun;114(6):1111-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.08.052. Epub 2007 Feb 23.
2
Comparison of Epi-LASIK and off-flap Epi-LASIK for the treatment of low and moderate myopia.上皮瓣准分子原位角膜磨镶术(Epi-LASIK)与非上皮瓣Epi-LASIK治疗中低度近视的比较。
Ophthalmology. 2008 Dec;115(12):2174-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.08.025.
3
Epi-LASIK: preliminary clinical results of an alternative surface ablation procedure.
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005 May;31(5):879-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.09.052.
4
Outcomes of epi-LASIK for the correction of high myopia and myopic astigmatism after more than 1 year.准分子上皮下角膜磨镶术矫治高度近视和近视散光1年以上的效果
Ophthalmologica. 2009;223(2):102-10. doi: 10.1159/000180118. Epub 2008 Dec 5.
5
A control-matched comparison of laser epithelial keratomileusis and laser in situ keratomileusis for low to moderate myopia.激光上皮下角膜磨镶术与准分子原位角膜磨镶术治疗轻中度近视的对照匹配比较。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2006 Dec;142(6):901-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2006.08.001. Epub 2006 Sep 8.
6
Comparison of visual results between laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy and epipolis laser in situ keratomileusis to correct myopia and myopic astigmatism.准分子激光上皮下角膜磨镶术与机械法准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术矫正近视及近视散光的视觉效果比较。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2008 Sep;146(3):357-362. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2008.05.022. Epub 2008 Jul 9.
7
Safety, efficacy, and stability indices of LASEK correction in moderate myopia and astigmatism.准分子激光上皮下角膜磨镶术(LASEK)矫正中度近视和散光的安全性、有效性及稳定性指标
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004 Oct;30(10):2130-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.02.070.
8
Visual outcomes after Epi-LASIK and PRK for low and moderate myopia.Epi-LASIK 和 PRK 治疗低度和中度近视的视觉效果。
J Refract Surg. 2012 Jan;28(1):65-71. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20111004-01. Epub 2011 Oct 10.
9
CustomVue laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia and myopic astigmatism using the Visx S4 excimer laser: Efficacy, predictability, and safety.使用威视S4准分子激光的CustomVue准分子原位角膜磨镶术治疗近视和近视散光:疗效、可预测性及安全性。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006 Mar;32(3):475-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2005.12.128.
10
Retreatment after wavefront-guided and standard myopic LASIK.波前像差引导的准分子原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)和标准准分子原位角膜磨镶术后的再次治疗
Ophthalmology. 2006 Sep;113(9):1623-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.04.019. Epub 2006 Jul 7.

引用本文的文献

1
The effect of refractive surgery on blur thresholds.屈光手术对模糊阈值的影响。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020 Dec;68(12):2998-3001. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1512_20.
2
Comparison of pain after subepithelial versus conventional accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking for keratoconus.圆锥角膜上皮下与传统加速角膜胶原交联术后疼痛比较
Int Ophthalmol. 2019 Jun;39(6):1249-1254. doi: 10.1007/s10792-018-0935-x. Epub 2018 May 7.
3
Comparison of clinical results between flap-on and flap-off techniques of epithelial-laser in situ keratomileusis in correction of low to moderate myopia in eyes with thin corneas.
角膜瓣掀起式与角膜瓣不掀起式上皮下准分子原位角膜磨镶术矫正薄角膜中低度近视的临床效果比较
Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2013 Jan;27(1):31-5. doi: 10.1016/j.sjopt.2012.06.001. Epub 2012 Jun 18.
4
Early postoperative pain and visual outcomes following epipolis-laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy.飞秒激光制瓣准分子原位角膜磨镶术和准分子激光角膜切削术后的早期疼痛及视觉效果
Korean J Ophthalmol. 2010 Jun;24(3):143-7. doi: 10.3341/kjo.2010.24.3.143. Epub 2010 Jun 5.
5
Excision of an inadvertent stromal flap after laser ablation in epipolis laser in situ keratomileusis.
Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2009 Mar;53(2):180-182. doi: 10.1007/s10384-008-0633-8. Epub 2009 Mar 31.