Teus Miguel A, de Benito-Llopis Laura, García-González Montserrat
Vissum Madrid, C/Santa Hortensia 58, Madrid, Spain.
Am J Ophthalmol. 2008 Sep;146(3):357-362. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2008.05.022. Epub 2008 Jul 9.
To compare the visual results after laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) and epipolis laser in situ keratomileusis (epi-LASIK) to correct myopia.
Retrospective, interventional, nonrandomized comparative study.
Patients treated with LASEK to correct myopia < or = -9.00 diopters (D) were compared to age- and refraction-matched patients treated with epi-LASIK using the same excimer laser (Esiris; Schwind Eye Tech Solutions, Kleinostheim, Germany). The epithelial flap was replaced after the ablation in every case. The visual results after both procedures were compared at each postoperative visit (one day, one week, one and three months).
Ninety-four consecutive eyes were included in the study (47 in each group), matched for age and refraction. The preoperative spherical manifest refraction was -3.98 +/- 2.40 D in the LASEK group and -3.95 +/- 2.40 D in the epi-LASIK group (P = .9) (range -0.50 to -9.00 D). The uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) one day postoperatively was 0.7 +/- 0.2 and 0.5 +/- 0.2 (P < .001), and one week after surgery it was 0.8 +/- 0.2 and 0.7 +/- 0.2, respectively (P = .1). The difference was again statistically significant one month after surgery (0.94 +/- 0.1 after LASEK, 0.82 +/- 0.1 after epi-LASIK, P < .001), but not three months postoperatively (1.06 +/- 0.21 and 1.03 +/- 0.18, respectively, P = .1). UCVA was > or =1.0 in 78.7% of LASEK eyes and 65.9% of epi-LASIK eyes three months after surgery. At that moment, the safety indices were 0.99 +/- 0.1 after LASEK and 0.93 +/- 0.1 after epi-LASIK (P = .04). The efficacy indices were 0.97 +/- 0.1 and 0.89 +/- 0.1, respectively (P = .01).
Our results suggest a faster visual rehabilitation and better safety and efficacy outcomes after LASEK compared to epi-LASIK with repositioning of the epithelial flap when correcting low to moderate myopia.
比较准分子激光上皮下角膜磨镶术(LASEK)和角膜上皮下准分子原位角膜磨镶术(epi-LASIK)矫正近视后的视觉效果。
回顾性、干预性、非随机对照研究。
将接受LASEK矫正近视度数≤-9.00屈光度(D)的患者与年龄和屈光度匹配、使用相同准分子激光(Esiris;德国施温德眼科技术解决方案公司,克莱诺施泰姆)进行epi-LASIK治疗的患者进行比较。每种情况下,在消融术后均将上皮瓣复位。在每次术后随访(术后1天、1周、1个月和3个月)时比较两种手术的视觉效果。
该研究共纳入94只连续的眼睛(每组47只),年龄和屈光度匹配。LASEK组术前球镜平均屈光不正为-3.98±2.40 D,epi-LASIK组为-3.95±2.40 D(P = 0.9)(范围为-0.50至-9.00 D)。术后1天的裸眼视力(UCVA)分别为0.7±0.2和0.5±0.2(P < 0.001),术后1周分别为0.8±0.2和0.7±0.2(P = 0.1)。术后1个月差异再次具有统计学意义(LASEK术后为0.94±0.1,epi-LASIK术后为0.82±0.1,P < 0.001),但术后3个月差异无统计学意义(分别为1.06±0.21和1.03±0.18,P = 0.1)。术后3个月,78.7%的LASEK眼和65.9%的epi-LASIK眼的UCVA≥1.0。此时,LASEK术后的安全指数为0.99±0.1,epi-LASIK术后为0.93±0.1(P = 0.04)。有效指数分别为0.97±0.1和0.89±0.1(P = 0.01)。
我们的结果表明,在矫正低度至中度近视时,与epi-LASIK且上皮瓣复位相比,LASEK术后视觉恢复更快,安全性和有效性更好。