Suppr超能文献

有妊娠期糖尿病病史的女性产后糖尿病筛查策略的效果与成本

Efficacy and cost of postpartum screening strategies for diabetes among women with histories of gestational diabetes mellitus.

作者信息

Kim Catherine, Herman William H, Vijan Sandeep

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Division of General Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

出版信息

Diabetes Care. 2007 May;30(5):1102-6. doi: 10.2337/dc06-2237. Epub 2007 Feb 23.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the cost and time to diagnosis associated with several screening strategies for diabetes in women with histories of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We simulated screening for diabetes with fasting plasma glucose (FPG), a 2-h oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), and A1C annually, every 2 years, and every 3 years over a period of 12 years. We assumed that women had negative screening tests 6 weeks after delivery, progressed to diabetes at 8% per year, and that each positive FPG and A1C was followed by a confirmatory FPG. For each strategy, we calculated the cost per case detected, cost per woman screened, the percent of cases detected, and the time elapsed with undiagnosed diabetes. In sensitivity analyses, we considered the inclusion of indirect costs, the impact of imperfect adherence to screening strategies, exclusion of confirmatory tests, and lower rates of progression to diabetes.

RESULTS

When annual, biannual, or every 3-year screening strategies were utilized, OGTTs resulted in lower costs per case detected than FPG or A1C. Testing every 3 years resulted in lower costs per case detected compared with more frequent testing. These patterns persisted in sensitivity analyses, except that FPG resulted in lower cost per case detected than OGTT, assuming annual screening and inclusion of indirect costs or assuming annual screening without a confirmatory FPG.

CONCLUSIONS

Screening every 3 years with OGTTs results in the lowest cost per case of detected diabetes.

摘要

目的

比较几种针对有妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)病史女性的糖尿病筛查策略的诊断成本和时间。

研究设计与方法

我们模拟了在12年期间,使用空腹血糖(FPG)、2小时口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)和糖化血红蛋白(A1C)进行糖尿病筛查,筛查频率分别为每年、每2年和每3年一次。我们假设女性在产后6周筛查结果为阴性,每年以8%的比例进展为糖尿病,且每次FPG和A1C阳性后均进行FPG确诊试验。对于每种策略,我们计算了每例确诊病例的成本、每位接受筛查女性的成本、确诊病例的百分比以及糖尿病未被诊断期间所经过的时间。在敏感性分析中,我们考虑了间接成本的纳入、筛查策略不完全依从的影响、排除确诊试验以及糖尿病进展率较低的情况。

结果

当采用每年、每两年或每三年的筛查策略时,OGTT检测每例病例的成本低于FPG或A1C。与更频繁的检测相比,每三年检测一次导致每例确诊病例的成本更低。这些模式在敏感性分析中仍然存在,只是在假设每年筛查并纳入间接成本或假设每年筛查且不进行FPG确诊试验的情况下,FPG检测每例病例的成本低于OGTT。

结论

每三年用OGTT进行筛查导致每例确诊糖尿病的成本最低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验