• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

当参数冲突时:关于分类模型的一则警示

When parameters collide: a warning about categorization models.

作者信息

Smith J David

机构信息

Department of Psychology, State University of New York, Buffalo, New York 14260, USA.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2006 Oct;13(5):743-51. doi: 10.3758/bf03193991.

DOI:10.3758/bf03193991
PMID:17328367
Abstract

Similarity-choice (S-C) models of categorization contain two principal mathematical transformations: an exponential-decay similarity function and a choice rule. However, there is a tension between the psychological processes that models emulate and the mathematics they use to do so. To illustrate this, I show that in these models an unappreciated interaction occurs between the mathematical transformations so that the stages of the model essentially cancel each other out. The result is that the model's output reflects its input linearly. This cancellation phenomenon has potentially serious implications regarding the interpretation and use of S-C models. The phenomenon also raises questions about the simplification and psychological grounding of categorization models. Modelers broadly might benefit from an internal analysis of their models, such as that described here.

摘要

分类的相似性选择(S-C)模型包含两个主要的数学变换:指数衰减相似性函数和选择规则。然而,模型所模拟的心理过程与它们用于模拟的数学之间存在矛盾。为了说明这一点,我表明在这些模型中,数学变换之间会发生一种未被重视的相互作用,以至于模型的各个阶段基本上相互抵消。结果是模型的输出线性地反映其输入。这种抵消现象对于S-C模型的解释和使用可能具有潜在的严重影响。该现象还引发了关于分类模型的简化和心理基础的问题。一般来说,建模者可能会从对其模型的内部分析中受益,比如这里所描述的分析。

相似文献

1
When parameters collide: a warning about categorization models.当参数冲突时:关于分类模型的一则警示
Psychon Bull Rev. 2006 Oct;13(5):743-51. doi: 10.3758/bf03193991.
2
Choice, similarity, and the context theory of classification.选择、相似性与分类的情境理论。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1984 Jan;10(1):104-14. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.10.1.104.
3
Similarity, identification, and categorization: comment on Ashby and Lee (1991).相似性、识别与分类:对阿什比和李(1991年)的评论
J Exp Psychol Gen. 1992 Jun;121(2):237-45. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.121.2.237.
4
An integrated theory of prospective time interval estimation: the role of cognition, attention, and learning.前瞻性时间间隔估计的综合理论:认知、注意力和学习的作用。
Psychol Rev. 2007 Jul;114(3):577-98. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.114.3.577.
5
Looking at pictures but remembering scenes.看图片却记住场景。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1992 Jan;18(1):180-91. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.18.1.180.
6
Holistic processing is not correlated with face-identification accuracy.整体加工与面孔识别准确性无关。
Psychol Sci. 2010 Jan;21(1):38-43. doi: 10.1177/0956797609356508. Epub 2009 Dec 17.
7
Predicting similarity and categorization from identification.从识别中预测相似性和分类。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 1991 Jun;120(2):150-72. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.120.2.150.
8
Similarity, distance, and categorization: a discussion of Smith's (2006) warning about "colliding parameters".
Psychon Bull Rev. 2007 Oct;14(5):823-33. doi: 10.3758/bf03194107.
9
Central tendencies, extreme points, and prototype enhancement effects in ill-defined perceptual categorization.不明确感知分类中的集中趋势、极端点和原型增强效应。
Q J Exp Psychol A. 2001 Feb;54(1):197-235. doi: 10.1080/02724980042000084.
10
Improving Human-Machine Cooperative Classification Via Cognitive Theories of Similarity.
Cogn Sci. 2017 Jul;41(5):1394-1411. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12400. Epub 2016 Jul 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Animal metacognition: a tale of two comparative psychologies.动物的元认知:两种比较心理学的故事。
J Comp Psychol. 2014 May;128(2):115-31. doi: 10.1037/a0033105. Epub 2013 Aug 19.
2
Similarity, distance, and categorization: a discussion of Smith's (2006) warning about "colliding parameters".
Psychon Bull Rev. 2007 Oct;14(5):823-33. doi: 10.3758/bf03194107.

本文引用的文献

1
FROST: a distributed neurocomputational model of working memory maintenance.弗罗斯特:工作记忆维持的分布式神经计算模型。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2005 Nov;17(11):1728-43. doi: 10.1162/089892905774589271.
2
Dynamical trajectories in category learning.
Percept Psychophys. 2004 Nov;66(8):1318-40. doi: 10.3758/bf03195001.
3
As easy to memorize as they are to classify: the 5-4 categories and the category advantage.既易于记忆又便于分类:5-4类别及类别优势。
Mem Cognit. 2003 Dec;31(8):1293-301. doi: 10.3758/bf03195812.
4
Exemplar theory's predicted typicality gradient can be tested and disconfirmed.范例理论所预测的典型性梯度可以得到检验并被证伪。
Psychol Sci. 2002 Sep;13(5):437-42. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00477.
5
Distinguishing prototype-based and exemplar-based processes in dot-pattern category learning.区分点模式类别学习中基于原型和基于范例的过程。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2002 Jul;28(4):800-11.
6
Comparing prototype-based and exemplar-based accounts of category learning and attentional allocation.比较基于原型和基于样例的类别学习与注意力分配理论。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2002 Mar;28(2):275-92. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.28.2.275.
7
Journey to the center of the category: the dissociation in amnesia between categorization and recognition.范畴核心之旅:失忆症中分类与识别之间的分离。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2001 Jul;27(4):984-1002. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.27.4.984.
8
How persuasive is a good fit? A comment on theory testing.良好契合度有多具说服力?对理论检验的评论。
Psychol Rev. 2000 Apr;107(2):358-67. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.107.2.358.
9
Thirty categorization results in search of a model.为寻找一个模型而进行的30次分类结果。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2000 Jan;26(1):3-27. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.26.1.3.
10
Selective attention and the formation of linear decision boundaries: comment on McKinley and Nosofsky (1996).选择性注意与线性决策边界的形成:对麦金利和诺索夫斯基(1996年)的评论
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1998 Feb;24(1):301-21; discussion 322-39. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.24.1.301.