The Grand Inquisitor's choice: comment on the CEJA report on withholding information from patients.
作者信息
Pirakitikulr Darlyn, Bursztajn Harold J
机构信息
Boston University School of Law, USA.
出版信息
J Clin Ethics. 2006 Winter;17(4):307-11.
PMID:17330720
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
The Grand Inquisitor's choice: comment on the CEJA report on withholding information from patients.宗教法庭大审判官的抉择：评欧洲司法大会关于向患者隐瞒信息的报告
J Clin Ethics. 2006 Winter;17(4):307-11.
2
3
Comment on the CEJA guidelines: treating patients who deny reality.关于欧洲联合老年医学学会（CEJA）指南的评论：治疗否认现实的患者。
J Clin Ethics. 2006 Winter;17(4):317-22.
4
The end of therapeutic privilege?治疗特权的终结？
J Clin Ethics. 2006 Winter;17(4):312-6.
5
The alchemy of informed consent.知情同意的微妙转变
J Clin Ethics. 2002 Spring;13(1):63-6.
6
Handbook on medical ethics: medical ethics and the practitioner.医学伦理学手册：医学伦理学与从业者
Issues Med Ethics. 1996 Apr-Jun;4(2):54-8.
7
Transparency and self-censorship in shared decision-making.共同决策中的透明度与自我审查。
Am J Bioeth. 2007 Jul;7(7):44-6. doi: 10.1080/15265160701399800.
8
Nudging and informed consent.推动与知情同意。
Am J Bioeth. 2013;13(6):3-11. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2013.781704.
9
Doctors, Patients, and Nudging in the Clinical Context--Four Views on Nudging and Informed Consent.临床环境中的医生、患者与助推——助推与知情同意的四种观点
Am J Bioeth. 2015;15(10):28-38. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2015.1074303.
10
Responses to open peer commentaries on "Physicians' silent decisions: because patient autonomy doesn't always come first".对关于《医生的无声决定：因为患者自主权并非总是首要考量》的公开同行评论的回应
Am J Bioeth. 2007 Jul;7(7):W1-3. doi: 10.1080/15265160701511495.
引用本文的文献
1
The need to know--therapeutic privilege: a way forward.知情同意权——治疗特权：前进的道路。
Health Care Anal. 2013 Jun;21(2):105-29. doi: 10.1007/s10728-012-0204-5.
Zotero 插件