Schroeder T J, Helling T, McKenna R M, Rush D, Jeffrey J R, Brewer B, Martin L A, Traylor D, Fisher R A, First M R
Dept. of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Ohio 45267-0714.
Transplantation. 1992 Jan;53(1):34-40.
The clinical utility of monitoring soluble interleukin 2 receptor (sIL-2R) as an indicator of immune stimulation in renal transplant patients was evaluated in a retrospective study at 3 centers. Serum samples (n = 2360) were obtained from 86 (17 living related donor, 69 cadaver) transplant recipients. The patients had received either triple therapy (n = 35) or antilymphocyte antibody induction therapy followed by triple therapy (n = 51). The mean period of postoperative observation was 118 days (range, 6-349 days). Serum sIL-2R concentrations were quantitated by an automated microparticle enzyme immunoassay (MEIA) (Abbott Diagnostics) in which sIL-2R was captured by 7G7/B6 monoclonal antibody-coated microparticles and detected by an immunospecific rabbit antihuman sIL-2R-alkaline phosphatase conjugate. A distinct advantage of the technique was rapid turn-around time: 1-24 results were obtained in less than 50 min. Cyclosporine trough concentrations were determined by radioimmunoassay or high-performance liquid chromatography. Diagnosis of rejection was established by clinical and histological criteria. The mean sIL-2R concentration in patients receiving antilymphocyte antibody induction therapy increased from 3486 +/- 1729 U/ml (+/- SD) at the time of transplant to a maximum of 7395 +/- 7101 U/ml on the third day posttransplant; this increase was not observed in patients receiving triple therapy (P less than 0.0001). By the sixth day of posttransplant, there were no differences in sIL-2R levels in the two groups. Fifty rejection episodes were observed in 29 patients on triple therapy. The mean sIL-2R concentration rose from 3022 U/ml at the data point prior to rejection to 3524 U/ml at the time of rejection. Thirty-four rejection episodes were observed in 26 patients receiving induction therapy. The mean sIL-2R concentration was 3015 U/ml at the data point prior to rejection and 4815 U/ml at the time of rejection. The sIL-2R concentrations began increasing earlier and rose higher in rejecting patients who received induction therapy than in those receiving triple therapy. Early posttransplant sIL-2R levels increased significantly more in cadaver recipients than in LRD recipients, reaching a maximum on day 2 posttransplant (P less than 0.001). Prerejection sIL-2R concentrations were significantly lower in LRD recipients than in cadaver recipients (2248 U/ml vs. 4290 U/ml, P less than 0.02), as were sIL-2R levels at the time of diagnosis of rejection (2800 U/ml vs. 4832 U/ml, P = 0.01). The mean sIL-2R level in stable long-term graft recipients was 2110 U/ml, with approximately 90% of values less than 3000 U/ml.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
在3个中心进行的一项回顾性研究中,对监测可溶性白细胞介素2受体(sIL-2R)作为肾移植患者免疫刺激指标的临床实用性进行了评估。从86例(17例活体亲属供肾、69例尸体供肾)移植受者中获取血清样本(n = 2360)。患者接受了三联疗法(n = 35)或抗淋巴细胞抗体诱导疗法后再接受三联疗法(n = 51)。术后观察的平均时间为118天(范围6 - 349天)。血清sIL-2R浓度通过自动微粒酶免疫测定法(MEIA)(雅培诊断公司)进行定量,其中sIL-2R由7G7/B6单克隆抗体包被的微粒捕获,并通过免疫特异性兔抗人sIL-2R-碱性磷酸酶偶联物进行检测。该技术的一个明显优势是周转时间快:不到50分钟即可获得1 - 24个结果。环孢素谷浓度通过放射免疫测定法或高效液相色谱法测定。根据临床和组织学标准确定排斥反应的诊断。接受抗淋巴细胞抗体诱导疗法的患者,其sIL-2R平均浓度从移植时的3486±1729 U/ml(±标准差)增加到移植后第三天的最高值7395±7101 U/ml;接受三联疗法的患者未观察到这种增加(P<0.0001)。到移植后第六天,两组的sIL-2R水平没有差异。接受三联疗法的29例患者中观察到50次排斥发作。sIL-2R平均浓度从排斥前数据点的3022 U/ml升至排斥时的3524 U/ml。接受诱导疗法的26例患者中观察到34次排斥发作。sIL-2R平均浓度在排斥前数据点为3015 U/ml,排斥时为4815 U/ml。接受诱导疗法的排斥患者中,sIL-2R浓度比接受三联疗法的患者更早开始升高且升得更高。移植后早期,尸体供肾受者的sIL-2R水平比活体亲属供肾受者显著升高更多,在移植后第2天达到最高值(P<0.001)。排斥前sIL-2R浓度在活体亲属供肾受者中显著低于尸体供肾受者(2248 U/ml对4290 U/ml,P<0.02),排斥诊断时的sIL-2R水平也是如此(2800 U/ml对4832 U/ml,P = 0.01)。长期移植稳定受者的sIL-2R平均水平为2110 U/ml,约90%的值低于3000 U/ml。(摘要截断于400字)