• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

看见光明:探索科拉维塔视觉优势效应

Seeing the light: exploring the Colavita visual dominance effect.

作者信息

Koppen Camille, Spence Charles

机构信息

Crossmodal Research Laboratory, Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3UD, UK.

出版信息

Exp Brain Res. 2007 Jul;180(4):737-54. doi: 10.1007/s00221-007-0894-3. Epub 2007 Feb 27.

DOI:10.1007/s00221-007-0894-3
PMID:17333012
Abstract

The Colavita visual dominance effect refers to the phenomenon whereby participants presented with unimodal auditory, unimodal visual, or bimodal audiovisual stimuli in a speeded discrimination task, fail to respond to the auditory component of bimodal targets significantly more often than they fail to respond to the visual component. The Colavita effect was demonstrated in this study when participants were presented with unimodal auditory, unimodal visual, or bimodal stimuli (in the ratios 40:40:20, Experiment 1; or 33:33:33, Experiment 2), to which they had to respond by pressing an auditory response key, a visual response key, or both response keys. The Colavita effect was also demonstrated when participants had to respond to the bimodal targets using a dedicated third (bimodal) response key (Experiment 3). These results therefore suggest that stimulus probability and the response demands of the task do not contribute significantly to the Colavita effect. In Experiment 4, we investigated what role exogenous attention toward a sensory modality plays in the Colavita effect. A significantly larger Colavita effect was observed when a visual cue preceded the bimodal target than when an auditory cue preceded it. This result suggests that the Colavita visual dominance effect can be partially explained in terms of the greater exogenous attention-capturing qualities of visual versus auditory stimuli.

摘要

科拉维塔视觉优势效应指的是在快速辨别任务中,向参与者呈现单峰听觉、单峰视觉或双峰视听刺激时,他们未能对双峰目标的听觉成分做出反应的频率显著高于未能对视觉成分做出反应的频率这一现象。在本研究中,当向参与者呈现单峰听觉、单峰视觉或双峰刺激(比例分别为40:40:20,实验1;或33:33:33,实验2),他们必须通过按下听觉反应键、视觉反应键或两个反应键来做出反应时,科拉维塔效应得到了证明。当参与者必须使用专门的第三个(双峰)反应键对双峰目标做出反应时(实验3),科拉维塔效应也得到了证明。因此,这些结果表明刺激概率和任务的反应要求对科拉维塔效应没有显著贡献。在实验4中,我们研究了对外在感官模态的注意在科拉维塔效应中所起的作用。当双峰目标之前出现视觉提示时,观察到的科拉维塔效应显著大于之前出现听觉提示时。这一结果表明,科拉维塔视觉优势效应可以部分地从视觉刺激比听觉刺激具有更强的外在注意捕获特性的角度来解释。

相似文献

1
Seeing the light: exploring the Colavita visual dominance effect.看见光明:探索科拉维塔视觉优势效应
Exp Brain Res. 2007 Jul;180(4):737-54. doi: 10.1007/s00221-007-0894-3. Epub 2007 Feb 27.
2
Spatial coincidence modulates the Colavita visual dominance effect.空间重合调节科拉维塔视觉优势效应。
Neurosci Lett. 2007 May 1;417(2):107-11. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2006.10.069. Epub 2007 Feb 15.
3
Audiovisual asynchrony modulates the Colavita visual dominance effect.视听异步调节科拉维塔视觉优势效应。
Brain Res. 2007 Dec;1186:224-32. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.09.076. Epub 2007 Oct 5.
4
Repetition blindness and the Colavita effect.重复盲视与科拉维塔效应。
Neurosci Lett. 2010 Aug 23;480(3):186-90. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.06.028. Epub 2010 Jun 16.
5
Assessing the role of stimulus probability on the Colavita visual dominance effect.评估刺激概率对科拉维塔视觉优势效应的作用。
Neurosci Lett. 2007 May 18;418(3):266-71. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2007.03.032. Epub 2007 Mar 18.
6
Semantic congruency and the Colavita visual dominance effect.语义一致性与科拉维塔视觉优势效应。
Exp Brain Res. 2008 Feb;184(4):533-46. doi: 10.1007/s00221-007-1120-z. Epub 2007 Sep 19.
7
Enhanced visual dominance in far space.远空间中视觉优势增强。
Exp Brain Res. 2015 Oct;233(10):2833-43. doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4353-2. Epub 2015 Jun 17.
8
The effect of synesthetic associations between the visual and auditory modalities on the Colavita effect.视觉与听觉模态之间的通感联想对科拉维塔效应的影响。
Exp Brain Res. 2016 May;234(5):1209-19. doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4363-0. Epub 2015 Jul 1.
9
Explaining the Colavita visual dominance effect.解释科拉维塔视觉优势效应。
Prog Brain Res. 2009;176:245-58. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(09)17615-X.
10
A signal detection study of the Colavita visual dominance effect.关于科拉维塔视觉优势效应的信号检测研究。
Exp Brain Res. 2009 Jul;196(3):353-60. doi: 10.1007/s00221-009-1853-y. Epub 2009 Jun 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring how sensory dominance modulated by modality-specific expectation: an event-related potential study.探索特定模态预期如何调节感觉优势:一项事件相关电位研究。
Front Psychol. 2025 Feb 17;16:1548100. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1548100. eCollection 2025.
2
The public mental representations of deepfake technology: An in-depth qualitative exploration through Quora text data analysis.深度伪造技术的公众心理表征:通过Quora文本数据分析进行的深入定性探索。
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 30;19(12):e0313605. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313605. eCollection 2024.
3
Audiovisual integration and sensory dominance effects in older adults with subjective cognitive decline: Enhanced redundant effects and stronger fusion illusion susceptibility.

本文引用的文献

1
Visual dominance and attention: the Colavita effect revisited.视觉优势与注意力:重温科拉维塔效应
Percept Psychophys. 2007 Jul;69(5):673-86. doi: 10.3758/bf03193770.
2
Spatial coincidence modulates the Colavita visual dominance effect.空间重合调节科拉维塔视觉优势效应。
Neurosci Lett. 2007 May 1;417(2):107-11. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2006.10.069. Epub 2007 Feb 15.
3
Visual dominance in the pigeon.鸽子的视觉优势。
老年人主观认知下降的视听整合和感觉优势效应:增强的冗余效应和更强的融合错觉易感性。
Brain Behav. 2024 Aug;14(8):e3570. doi: 10.1002/brb3.3570.
4
The neural representations underlying asymmetric cross-modal prediction of words.左右不对称的跨模态单词预测的神经表现。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2023 Apr 15;44(6):2418-2435. doi: 10.1002/hbm.26219. Epub 2023 Jan 30.
5
Visual-auditory interactions on explicit and implicit information processing.视觉-听觉相互作用对显式和隐式信息处理的影响。
Cogn Process. 2022 May;23(2):179-189. doi: 10.1007/s10339-022-01077-2. Epub 2022 Feb 10.
6
Endogenous Spatial Attention Modulates the Magnitude of the Colavita Visual Dominance Effect.内源性空间注意调节科拉维塔视觉优势效应的大小。
Iperception. 2021 Jul 12;12(4):20416695211027186. doi: 10.1177/20416695211027186. eCollection 2021 Jul-Aug.
7
Stimulus temporal uncertainty balances intersensory dominance.刺激时间不确定性平衡了感觉间优势。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Dec;28(6):1874-1884. doi: 10.3758/s13423-021-01959-0. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
8
Top-down task-specific determinants of multisensory motor reaction time enhancements and sensory switch costs.自上而下的任务特异性决定因素对多感觉运动反应时间增强和感觉转换代价的影响。
Exp Brain Res. 2021 Mar;239(3):1021-1034. doi: 10.1007/s00221-020-06014-3. Epub 2021 Jan 30.
9
Olfactory Influences on Visual Categorization: Behavioral and ERP Evidence.嗅觉对视觉分类的影响:行为和 ERP 证据。
Cereb Cortex. 2020 Jun 1;30(7):4220-4237. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhaa050.
10
Top-down attention modulates the direction and magnitude of sensory dominance.自上而下的注意力调节感觉优势的方向和幅度。
Exp Brain Res. 2020 Mar;238(3):587-600. doi: 10.1007/s00221-020-05737-7. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1978 Sep;30(2):129-37. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1978.30-129.
4
The modality shift effect and the effectiveness of warning signals in different modalities.不同模态下的模态转换效应及警告信号的有效性。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2005 Oct;120(2):199-226. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2005.05.002.
5
Audiovisual prior entry.视听预先录入。
Neurosci Lett. 2005 Jun 24;381(3):217-22. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2005.01.085. Epub 2005 Mar 2.
6
Sensory uncertainty governs the extent of audio-visual interaction.感官不确定性决定视听交互的程度。
Vision Res. 2004 Nov;44(25):2875-84. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2004.07.001.
7
Semantic congruence is a critical factor in multisensory behavioral performance.语义一致性是多感官行为表现中的一个关键因素。
Exp Brain Res. 2004 Oct;158(4):405-14. doi: 10.1007/s00221-004-1913-2. Epub 2004 Jun 18.
8
Sequence learning and sequential effects.序列学习与序列效应。
Psychol Res. 2004 Dec;69(1-2):124-37. doi: 10.1007/s00426-003-0163-4. Epub 2004 May 25.
9
Space-independent modality-driven attentional capture in auditory, tactile and visual systems.听觉、触觉和视觉系统中与空间无关的模态驱动的注意捕获。
Exp Brain Res. 2004 Apr;155(3):301-10. doi: 10.1007/s00221-003-1724-x. Epub 2003 Dec 5.
10
VISION AND TOUCH: AN EXPERIMENTALLY CREATED CONFLICT BETWEEN THE TWO SENSES.视觉与触觉:两种感官之间的实验性冲突
Science. 1964 Feb 7;143(3606):594-6. doi: 10.1126/science.143.3606.594.