Koppen Camille, Levitan Carmel A, Spence Charles
Crossmodal Research Laboratory, Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3UD, UK.
Exp Brain Res. 2009 Jul;196(3):353-60. doi: 10.1007/s00221-009-1853-y. Epub 2009 Jun 2.
When presented with auditory, visual, or bimodal audiovisual stimuli in a speeded detection/discrimination task, participants fail to respond to the auditory component of the bimodal targets significantly more often than they fail to respond to the visual component. Signal detection theory (SDT) was used to explore the contributions of perceptual (sensitivity shifts) and decisional (shifts in response criteria) factors to this effect, known as the Colavita visual dominance effect. Participants performed a version of the Colavita task that had been modified to allow for SDT analyses. The participants had to detect auditory and visual targets (presented unimodally or bimodally) at their individually determined 75% detection thresholds. The results showed a significant decrease in participants' sensitivity to auditory stimuli when presented concurrently with visual stimuli (in the absence of any significant change in their response criterion), suggesting that Colavita visual dominance does not simply reflect a decisional effect, but can be explained, at least in part, as a truly perceptual phenomenon. The decrease in sensitivity (to auditory stimuli) may be attributable to the exogenous capture of participants' attention by the visual component of the bimodal target, thus leaving fewer attentional resources for the processing of the auditory stimulus. The reduction in auditory sensitivity reported here may be considered an example of crossmodal masking.
在快速检测/辨别任务中,当呈现听觉、视觉或视听双模式刺激时,参与者未能对双模式目标的听觉成分做出反应的频率,显著高于未能对视觉成分做出反应的频率。信号检测理论(SDT)被用于探究感知因素(敏感性变化)和决策因素(反应标准变化)对这种效应(即科拉维塔视觉优势效应)的贡献。参与者执行了一个经过修改的科拉维塔任务版本,以允许进行信号检测理论分析。参与者必须在各自确定的75%检测阈值下检测听觉和视觉目标(单模式或双模式呈现)。结果显示,当与视觉刺激同时呈现时,参与者对听觉刺激的敏感性显著降低(在其反应标准没有任何显著变化的情况下),这表明科拉维塔视觉优势效应不仅仅反映了一种决策效应,至少在一定程度上可以解释为一种真正的感知现象。敏感性的降低(对听觉刺激而言)可能归因于双模式目标的视觉成分对外源性地吸引了参与者的注意力,从而为处理听觉刺激留下了更少的注意力资源。这里报道的听觉敏感性降低可能被视为跨模式掩蔽的一个例子。