• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自上而下的注意力调节感觉优势的方向和幅度。

Top-down attention modulates the direction and magnitude of sensory dominance.

机构信息

Center for Studies of Psychological Application, School of Psychology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, 510631, People's Republic of China.

Guangdong Key Laboratory of Mental Health and Cognitive Science, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, 510631, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Exp Brain Res. 2020 Mar;238(3):587-600. doi: 10.1007/s00221-020-05737-7. Epub 2020 Jan 30.

DOI:10.1007/s00221-020-05737-7
PMID:31996936
Abstract

Bottom-up inputs from multiple sensory modalities compete to reach perceptual consciousness. The sensory dominance effect refers to the phenomenon that stimuli from one sensory modality are preferentially selected over the other modalities. Top-down attention helps us to select task-relevant information while filtering out task-irrelevant distracting information. To investigate how top-down attention towards one specific modality modulates the sensory dominance effect, we incorporated the endogenous cue-target paradigm and an adapted version of the Colavita paradigm in the present study. The visual responses could either precede or fall behind the auditory responses, i.e., the visual vs. auditory precedence trials. The direction of the sensory dominance was defined as the proportion of the visual vs. auditory precedence bimodal trials, and the magnitude of the sensory dominance was calculated as the difference in reaction times between the first and the second responses in the bimodal trials. Results from the present three experiments consistently showed that when attention was voluntarily directed to the visual modality, the visual dominance occurred more frequently than the auditory dominance, and the magnitude of the visual dominance was significantly larger than the auditory dominance. This pattern of results was independent of the delivery modality of the cue. The present results thus provide direct empirical evidence showing that endogenous attention towards one specific sensory modality modulates both the direction and the size of sensory dominance.

摘要

来自多种感觉模式的自下而上的输入竞争达到知觉意识。感觉优势效应是指一种现象,即来自一种感觉模式的刺激优先于其他感觉模式被选择。自上而下的注意力有助于我们选择与任务相关的信息,同时过滤掉与任务无关的干扰信息。为了研究自上而下的注意力对特定感觉模式的调制如何影响感觉优势效应,我们在本研究中结合了内源性线索-目标范式和 Colavita 范式的改编版。视觉反应可以先于或落后于听觉反应,即视觉与听觉优先试验。感觉优势的方向被定义为视觉与听觉双模态试验中视觉与听觉的比例,感觉优势的大小被计算为双模态试验中第一和第二反应之间的反应时间差异。本三个实验的结果一致表明,当注意力自愿指向视觉模式时,视觉优势比听觉优势更频繁出现,并且视觉优势的大小明显大于听觉优势。这种结果模式独立于线索的传递模式。因此,本研究结果提供了直接的经验证据,表明对特定感觉模式的内源性注意力调节感觉优势的方向和大小。

相似文献

1
Top-down attention modulates the direction and magnitude of sensory dominance.自上而下的注意力调节感觉优势的方向和幅度。
Exp Brain Res. 2020 Mar;238(3):587-600. doi: 10.1007/s00221-020-05737-7. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
2
Existence of competing modality dominances.存在相互竞争的模态优势。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2016 May;78(4):1104-14. doi: 10.3758/s13414-016-1061-3.
3
Audiovisual asynchrony modulates the Colavita visual dominance effect.视听异步调节科拉维塔视觉优势效应。
Brain Res. 2007 Dec;1186:224-32. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.09.076. Epub 2007 Oct 5.
4
Seeing the light: exploring the Colavita visual dominance effect.看见光明:探索科拉维塔视觉优势效应
Exp Brain Res. 2007 Jul;180(4):737-54. doi: 10.1007/s00221-007-0894-3. Epub 2007 Feb 27.
5
Spatial coincidence modulates the Colavita visual dominance effect.空间重合调节科拉维塔视觉优势效应。
Neurosci Lett. 2007 May 1;417(2):107-11. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2006.10.069. Epub 2007 Feb 15.
6
Neural practice effect during cross-modal selective attention: Supra-modal and modality-specific effects.跨模态选择性注意中的神经练习效应:超模态和模态特异性效应。
Cortex. 2018 Sep;106:47-64. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.05.003. Epub 2018 May 16.
7
Repetition blindness and the Colavita effect.重复盲视与科拉维塔效应。
Neurosci Lett. 2010 Aug 23;480(3):186-90. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.06.028. Epub 2010 Jun 16.
8
Reversing the Colavita visual dominance effect.逆转科拉维塔视觉优势效应。
Exp Brain Res. 2011 Oct;214(4):607-18. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2859-9. Epub 2011 Sep 11.
9
Vision dominates at the preresponse level and audition dominates at the response level in cross-modal interaction: behavioral and neural evidence.在跨模态交互中,视觉在预反应水平占主导地位,听觉在反应水平占主导地位:行为和神经证据。
J Neurosci. 2013 Apr 24;33(17):7109-21. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1985-12.2013.
10
Changes in sensory dominance during childhood: converging evidence from the colavita effect and the sound-induced flash illusion.儿童期感觉优势的变化:来自 Colavita 效应和声音诱导闪光错觉的趋同证据。
Child Dev. 2013 Mar-Apr;84(2):604-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01856.x. Epub 2012 Sep 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring how sensory dominance modulated by modality-specific expectation: an event-related potential study.探索特定模态预期如何调节感觉优势:一项事件相关电位研究。
Front Psychol. 2025 Feb 17;16:1548100. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1548100. eCollection 2025.
2
Endogenous Spatial Attention Modulates the Magnitude of the Colavita Visual Dominance Effect.内源性空间注意调节科拉维塔视觉优势效应的大小。
Iperception. 2021 Jul 12;12(4):20416695211027186. doi: 10.1177/20416695211027186. eCollection 2021 Jul-Aug.
3
Hand preference for the visual and auditory modalities in humans.

本文引用的文献

1
Vision dominates audition in adults but not children: A meta-analysis of the Colavita effect.成人的视觉主导听觉,但儿童并非如此:科拉维塔效应的荟萃分析。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2018 Nov;94:286-301. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.07.012. Epub 2018 Jul 23.
2
Neurophysiological Correlates of Visual Dominance: A Lateralized Readiness Potential Investigation.视觉优势的神经生理关联:一项偏侧化准备电位研究。
Front Psychol. 2017 Mar 2;8:303. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00303. eCollection 2017.
3
Multisensory Competition Is Modulated by Sensory Pathway Interactions with Fronto-Sensorimotor and Default-Mode Network Regions.
人类在视觉和听觉模态上的利手偏好。
Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 12;11(1):7868. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-87396-4.
多感官竞争由感觉通路与额-感觉运动及默认模式网络区域的相互作用所调节。
J Neurosci. 2015 Jun 17;35(24):9064-77. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3760-14.2015.
4
Enhanced visual dominance in far space.远空间中视觉优势增强。
Exp Brain Res. 2015 Oct;233(10):2833-43. doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4353-2. Epub 2015 Jun 17.
5
Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses.使用 G*Power 3.1 进行统计功效分析:相关和回归分析的检验。
Behav Res Methods. 2009 Nov;41(4):1149-60. doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149.
6
Explaining the Colavita visual dominance effect.解释科拉维塔视觉优势效应。
Prog Brain Res. 2009;176:245-58. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(09)17615-X.
7
A signal detection study of the Colavita visual dominance effect.关于科拉维塔视觉优势效应的信号检测研究。
Exp Brain Res. 2009 Jul;196(3):353-60. doi: 10.1007/s00221-009-1853-y. Epub 2009 Jun 2.
8
Sensory dominance in combinations of audio, visual and haptic stimuli.音频、视觉和触觉刺激组合中的感觉优势。
Exp Brain Res. 2009 Feb;193(2):307-14. doi: 10.1007/s00221-008-1626-z. Epub 2008 Nov 5.
9
When vision 'extinguishes' touch in neurologically-normal people: extending the Colavita visual dominance effect.在神经功能正常的人群中,当视觉“抑制”触觉时:扩展科拉维塔视觉优势效应。
Exp Brain Res. 2008 Apr;186(4):643-58. doi: 10.1007/s00221-008-1272-5. Epub 2008 Feb 27.
10
Visual dominance and attention: the Colavita effect revisited.视觉优势与注意力:重温科拉维塔效应
Percept Psychophys. 2007 Jul;69(5):673-86. doi: 10.3758/bf03193770.