[A comparison of rebound tonometry (ICare) with TonoPenXL and Goldmann applanation tonometry].

BACKGROUND

Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry (PASCAL) are two well established slit lamp mounted tonometric methods. Intraocular pressure measurement in bedridden patients and children is often only possible using hand held tonometers (TonoPenXL, Perkins tonometer, Draeger tonometer). This study was performed to evaluate the hand held ICare tonometer, which is based on the rebound method.

METHODS

A total of 102 eyes were examined by two highly experienced ophthalmologists for: 1) ophthalmological status, 2) central corneal power (Zeiss IOL-Master), 3) central corneal thickness (Tomey ultrasound pachymetry, five successive measurements, SD<5%), 4) intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement with the Goldmann applantation tonometer (GAT) 1x, 5) TonoPenXL (1x), 6) ICare with three successive measurement series of 6 single measurements.

RESULTS

The mean IOP(GAT) was 13.2+/-3.0 mmHg compared with the mean IOP(TonoPenXL) (13.4+/-3.1 mmHg) and with the IOP(ICare) (mean value of first measurement series: 13.4+/-3.1 mmHg). The series of measurements with the ICare showed a tonography effect (decrease of IOP from 14.6 mmHg at the first measurement and 14.2 mmHg at the second to 14.0 at the third measurement). The ICare-measurements were highly reliable (Cronbach's alpha=0.974) and showed a good correlation between the measurement series (r=0.592-0.642; p<0.001). There was a great intra-individual variability of up to 17 mmHg between the GAT, TonoPenXL and ICare methods.

CONCLUSIONS

The ICare tonometer is easy to handle and high reliability. The data are comparable with those from the Goldmann tonometer. A tonography effect of 0.6 mmHg in the successive measurement series was found.