Suppr超能文献

英国目前对食管食物团梗阻的管理是否基于证据?一项电子邮件调查与文献综述。

Is current UK management of oesophageal food bolus obstruction evidence based? An e-mail survey and literature review.

作者信息

Price T, Jones S E M, Montgomery P Q

机构信息

Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK.

出版信息

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2007 Apr;264(4):329-35. doi: 10.1007/s00405-007-0260-x. Epub 2007 Feb 14.

Abstract

There is a great deal of variation in individual management of non-sharp oesophageal food bolus obstruction in the United Kingdom. An e-mail survey of consultants and specialist registrars in ENT was carried out to establish current UK practice. A review of the published literature was under-taken to establish whether current practice is evidence based. The majority of practitioners (95%) do not proceed immediately to rigid oesophagoscopy but use antispasmodic drugs (83%), most commonly hyoscine butylbromide (Buscopan) and diazepam, to try to induce spontaneous passage of the obstruction. There is currently no evidence in the published literature to support the use of these drugs. The use of Buscopan seems to have been encouraged by a misquoted reference in a prominent ENT textbook. Better evidence is needed to establish the best form of treatment for this relatively common problem.

摘要

在英国,非尖锐性食管食物团块梗阻的个体管理存在很大差异。对耳鼻喉科的顾问医生和专科住院医生进行了一项电子邮件调查,以确定英国目前的做法。对已发表的文献进行了综述,以确定目前的做法是否有循证依据。大多数从业者(95%)不会立即进行硬质食管镜检查,而是使用解痉药物(83%),最常用的是丁溴东莨菪碱(解痉灵)和地西泮,试图促使梗阻自行缓解。目前已发表的文献中没有证据支持使用这些药物。一本著名的耳鼻喉科教科书中错误引用的参考文献似乎促使了解痉灵的使用。需要更好的证据来确定针对这个相对常见问题的最佳治疗方式。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验