Vuorilehto Maria S, Melartin Tarja K, Rytsälä Heikki J, Isometsä Erkki T
Department of Mental Health and Alcohol Research, National Public Health Institute, FinlandPrimary Health Care Organization of the City of Vantaa, Finland.
Psychol Med. 2007 Jun;37(6):893-904. doi: 10.1017/S0033291707000098. Epub 2007 Mar 5.
Despite the need for rational allocation of resources and cooperation between different treatment settings, clinical differences in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) between primary and psychiatric care remain obscure. We investigated these differences in representative patient populations from primary care versus secondary level psychiatric care in the city of Vantaa, Finland.
We compared MDD patients from primary care in the Vantaa Primary Care Depression Study (PC-VDS) (n=79) with psychiatric out-patients (n=223) and in-patients (n=46) in the Vantaa Depression Study (VDS). DSM-IV diagnoses were assigned by the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I disorders (SCID-I in PC-VDS) or Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry (SCAN in VDS), and SCID-II interviews. Comparable information was collected on depression severity, Axis I and II co-morbidity, suicidal behaviour, preceding clinical course, and attitudes towards and pathways to treatment.
Prevalence of psychotic subtype and severity of depression were highest among in-patients, but otherwise few clinical differences between psychiatric and primary care patients were detected. Suicide attempts, alcohol dependence, and cluster A personality disorder were associated with treatment in psychiatric care, whereas cluster B personality disorder was associated with primary care treatment. Patients' choice of the initial point of contact for current depressive symptoms seemed to be independent of prior clinical history or attitude towards treatment.
Severe, suicidal and psychotic depression cluster in psychiatric in-patient settings, as expected. However, MDD patients in primary care or psychiatric out-patient settings may not differ markedly in their clinical characteristics. This apparent blurring of boundaries between treatment settings calls for enhanced cooperation between settings, and clearer and more structured division of labour.
尽管需要合理分配资源以及不同治疗机构之间开展合作,但初级保健与精神科护理中重度抑郁症(MDD)患者的临床差异仍不明确。我们在芬兰万塔市具有代表性的初级保健与二级精神科护理患者群体中调查了这些差异。
我们将万塔初级保健抑郁症研究(PC-VDS)中的初级保健MDD患者(n = 79)与万塔抑郁症研究(VDS)中的精神科门诊患者(n = 223)及住院患者(n = 46)进行了比较。DSM-IV诊断通过DSM-IV轴I障碍的结构化临床访谈(PC-VDS中为SCID-I)或神经精神病学临床评估量表(VDS中为SCAN)以及SCID-II访谈来确定。收集了关于抑郁严重程度、轴I和轴II共病、自杀行为、既往临床病程以及对治疗的态度和治疗途径的可比信息。
住院患者中精神病性亚型的患病率和抑郁严重程度最高,但除此之外,未检测到精神科与初级保健患者之间的临床差异。自杀未遂、酒精依赖和A类人格障碍与精神科护理治疗相关,而B类人格障碍与初级保健治疗相关。患者对当前抑郁症状初始接触点的选择似乎与既往临床病史或对治疗的态度无关。
正如预期的那样,严重、有自杀倾向和精神病性抑郁症集中在精神科住院患者中。然而,初级保健或精神科门诊环境中的MDD患者在临床特征上可能没有明显差异。这种治疗机构之间界限的明显模糊需要加强机构间的合作,以及更清晰、更结构化的分工。