Suppr超能文献

疑似颈椎损伤急性气道管理的手动轴向稳定:历史回顾与当前问题

Manual in-line stabilization for acute airway management of suspected cervical spine injury: historical review and current questions.

作者信息

Manoach Seth, Paladino Lorenzo

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, State University of New York-Downstate and Kings County Hospital Center, Brooklyn, NY 11203, USA.

出版信息

Ann Emerg Med. 2007 Sep;50(3):236-45. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.01.009. Epub 2007 Mar 6.

Abstract

Direct laryngoscopy with manual in-line stabilization is standard of care for acute trauma patients with suspected cervical spine injury. Ethical and methodologic constraints preclude controlled trials of manual in-line stabilization, and recent work questions its effectiveness. We searched MEDLINE, Index Medicus, Web of Knowledge, the Cochrane Database, and article reference lists. According to this search, we present an ancestral review tracing the origins of manual in-line stabilization and an analysis of subsequent studies evaluating the risks and benefits of the procedure. All manual in-line stabilization data came from trials of uninjured patients, cadaveric models, and case series. The procedure was adopted because of reasonable inference from the benefits of stabilization during general care of spine-injured patients, weak empirical data, and expert opinion. More recent data indicate that direct laryngoscopy and intubation are unlikely to cause clinically significant movement and that manual in-line stabilization may not immobilize injured segments. In addition, manual in-line stabilization degrades laryngoscopic view, which may cause hypoxia and worsen outcomes in traumatic brain injury. Patients intubated in the emergency department with suspected cervical spine injury often have traumatic brain injury, but the incidence of unstable cervical lesions in this group is low. The limited available evidence suggests that allowing some flexion or extension of the head is unlikely to cause secondary injury and may facilitate prompt intubation in difficult cases. Despite the presumed safety and efficacy of direct laryngoscopy with manual in-line stabilization, alternative techniques that do not require direct visualization warrant investigation. Promising techniques include intubation through supraglottic airways, along with video laryngoscopes, optical stylets, and other imaging devices.

摘要

对于疑似颈椎损伤的急性创伤患者,直接喉镜检查并辅以手动轴向固定是标准的治疗方法。伦理和方法学上的限制使得无法进行关于手动轴向固定的对照试验,并且最近的研究对其有效性提出了质疑。我们检索了MEDLINE、医学索引、知识网络、Cochrane数据库以及文章参考文献列表。根据此次检索,我们呈现了一项追溯手动轴向固定起源的溯源性综述,并对随后评估该操作风险和益处的研究进行了分析。所有关于手动轴向固定的数据均来自对未受伤患者的试验、尸体模型以及病例系列研究。该操作的采用是基于从脊柱损伤患者的一般护理中稳定化的益处进行的合理推断、薄弱的实证数据以及专家意见。最近的数据表明,直接喉镜检查和插管不太可能导致具有临床意义的移动,并且手动轴向固定可能无法固定受伤节段。此外,手动轴向固定会降低喉镜视野,这可能导致缺氧并使创伤性脑损伤的预后恶化。在急诊科因疑似颈椎损伤而插管的患者通常伴有创伤性脑损伤,但该组中不稳定颈椎病变的发生率较低。有限的现有证据表明,允许头部有一定程度的屈伸不太可能造成二次损伤,并且可能有助于在困难病例中迅速插管。尽管直接喉镜检查并辅以手动轴向固定被认为是安全有效的,但无需直接可视化的替代技术值得研究。有前景的技术包括通过声门上气道进行插管,以及使用视频喉镜、光导探条和其他成像设备。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验