Suppr超能文献

[用免疫过氧化物酶法测定抗巨细胞病毒抗体:与补体结合法和免疫荧光法的比较]

[Determination of anti-cytomegalovirus antibodies by the immunoperoxidase method: comparison with the methods of complement fixation and immunofluorescence].

作者信息

Gerna G, McCloud C J, Cattaneo E, Cereda P, Gallina M

出版信息

Boll Ist Sieroter Milan. 1975 Jun 26;54(2):126-35.

PMID:173374
Abstract

Indirect immunoperoxidase technique (IIP) has been employed for determination of IgG antibody titer to cytomegalovirus (CMV) in sera from 110 blood donors. Titers have been compared with complement fixation (CF) and indirect fluorescent antibody (IFA) technique titers, the latter being applied to determination of all specific antibody classes. Within variability range of the quality of reagents employed in different tests, it seems reasonable to conclude IIP technique is as sensitive as IFA and much more sensitive than CF test. Considering CF test is able to detect only IgG antibody, the advantage of using immunohistochemical techniques is obvious. Moreover IIP does not need fluorescence microscope and results reading is easier and can be delayed. Non-specific staining of Golgi area is shared by both techniques, but endpoint determination has to take into account only the nuclear virus-specific inclusion labelling.

摘要

间接免疫过氧化物酶技术(IIP)已用于测定110名献血者血清中针对巨细胞病毒(CMV)的IgG抗体滴度。已将这些滴度与补体结合(CF)和间接荧光抗体(IFA)技术的滴度进行比较,后者用于测定所有特异性抗体类别。在不同测试中所用试剂质量的可变范围内,可以合理地得出结论,IIP技术与IFA一样灵敏,且比CF测试灵敏得多。考虑到CF测试只能检测IgG抗体,使用免疫组织化学技术的优势显而易见。此外,IIP不需要荧光显微镜,结果读取更容易且可以延迟。两种技术都存在高尔基体区域的非特异性染色,但终点判定仅需考虑细胞核内病毒特异性包涵体的标记。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验