Gerna G, McCloud C J, Chambers R W
J Clin Microbiol. 1976 Mar;3(3):364-72. doi: 10.1128/jcm.3.3.364-372.1976.
The indirect immunoperoxidase antibody technique (IPA) has been applied to determine immunoglobulin (Ig)G to humans cytomegalovirus (CMV) antibodies in 114 blood donor sera, four cases of congenital cytomegalic inclusion disease, and four cases of acquired CMV infection. The results have been compared with those obtained with the CMV complement fixation (CF) test and indirect fluorescent antibody technique (IFA) for broad spectrum CMV antibody (sigmaAb) detection. IgG antibody has been detected by both CF and IPA. In healthy adult people IPA titers are usually higher than CF titers. In addition, IFA sigmaAb titers are generally higher than CF titers. Some sera negative by CF and IPA are positive at low dilutions by IFA sigmaAb antibody determination, due to the detection of small amounts of IgA or noncomplement-fixing IgG. Nonspecific results seem unlikely, since only nuclear inclusion fluorescence was interpreted as specific, as demonstrated by blocking tests. In acute CMV infection, the IFA sigmaAb and IPA IgG titers are essentially the same, except during the first weeks of infection, when IFA titers are higher and IgM is detectable. No cross-reactivity with other herpes group viruses, herpes simplex and varicella-zoster, was observed. Although some problems of nonspecific staining of cytoplasmic inclusions are shared by both methods, the IPA technique seems to possess the same degree of sensitivity and specificity as the IFA technique, but interpretation is easier and various procedural steps can be delayed without the technical problems associated with fluorescence microscopy.
间接免疫过氧化物酶抗体技术(IPA)已用于检测114份献血者血清、4例先天性巨细胞包涵体病患者血清及4例获得性巨细胞病毒(CMV)感染患者血清中的人巨细胞病毒(CMV)抗体IgG。已将结果与用CMV补体结合(CF)试验及间接荧光抗体技术(IFA)检测广谱CMV抗体(sigmaAb)所获结果进行比较。CF和IPA均可检测到IgG抗体。在健康成年人中,IPA滴度通常高于CF滴度。此外,IFA sigmaAb滴度一般也高于CF滴度。CF和IPA检测为阴性的一些血清,IFA sigmaAb抗体检测在低稀释度时呈阳性,这是由于检测到少量IgA或非补体结合性IgG。非特异性结果似乎不太可能出现,因为阻断试验表明只有核内包涵体荧光被解释为特异性荧光。在急性CMV感染中,IFA sigmaAb和IPA IgG滴度基本相同,只是在感染的最初几周,IFA滴度较高且可检测到IgM。未观察到与其他疱疹病毒组病毒(单纯疱疹病毒和水痘-带状疱疹病毒)的交叉反应。虽然两种方法都存在细胞质包涵体非特异性染色的一些问题,但IPA技术似乎具有与IFA技术相同程度的敏感性和特异性,不过其判读更容易,而且各个操作步骤可以延迟进行,而不会出现与荧光显微镜相关的技术问题。