Folks Russell D, Garcia Ernest V, Taylor Andrew T
Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, USA.
J Nucl Med Technol. 2007 Mar;35(1):27-33.
Quantitative nuclear renography has numerous potential sources of error. We previously reported the initial development of a computer software module for comprehensively addressing the issue of quality control (QC) in the analysis of radionuclide renal images. The objective of this study was to prospectively test the QC software.
The QC software works in conjunction with standard quantitative renal image analysis using a renal quantification program. The software saves a text file that summarizes QC findings as possible errors in user-entered values, calculated values that may be unreliable because of the patient's clinical condition, and problems relating to acquisition or processing. To test the QC software, a technologist not involved in software development processed 83 consecutive nontransplant clinical studies. The QC findings of the software were then tabulated. QC events were defined as technical (study descriptors that were out of range or were entered and then changed, unusually sized or positioned regions of interest, or missing frames in the dynamic image set) or clinical (calculated functional values judged to be erroneous or unreliable).
Technical QC events were identified in 36 (43%) of 83 studies. Clinical QC events were identified in 37 (45%) of 83 studies. Specific QC events included starting the camera after the bolus had reached the kidney, dose infiltration, oversubtraction of background activity, and missing frames in the dynamic image set.
QC software has been developed to automatically verify user input, monitor calculation of renal functional parameters, summarize QC findings, and flag potentially unreliable values for the nuclear medicine physician. Incorporation of automated QC features into commercial or local renal software can reduce errors and improve technologist performance and should improve the efficiency and accuracy of image interpretation.
定量肾动态显像存在众多潜在误差来源。我们之前报道了用于全面解决放射性核素肾图像分析中质量控制(QC)问题的计算机软件模块的初步开发。本研究的目的是对该QC软件进行前瞻性测试。
该QC软件与使用肾定量程序的标准定量肾图像分析协同工作。该软件会保存一个文本文件,总结QC结果,包括用户输入值中可能的误差、因患者临床状况可能不可靠的计算值以及与采集或处理相关的问题。为测试该QC软件,一名未参与软件开发的技术人员处理了83例连续的非移植临床研究。然后将软件的QC结果制成表格。QC事件被定义为技术方面的(研究描述符超出范围或输入后又更改、感兴趣区域大小或位置异常或动态图像集中缺少帧)或临床方面的(判断为错误或不可靠的计算功能值)。
83项研究中有36项(43%)发现了技术QC事件。83项研究中有37项(45%)发现了临床QC事件。具体的QC事件包括在团注到达肾脏后启动相机、剂量渗漏、背景活性过度扣除以及动态图像集中缺少帧。
已开发出QC软件,以自动验证用户输入、监测肾功能参数的计算、总结QC结果,并为核医学医师标记潜在不可靠的值。将自动化QC功能纳入商业或本地肾软件可以减少误差,提高技术人员的表现,并应提高图像解读的效率和准确性。