O'Hanlon Rory, O'Shea Paula, Ledwidge Mark, O'Loughlin Christina, Lange Sophie, Conlon Carmel, Phelan Dermot, Cunningham Sean, McDonald Ken
Heart Failure Unit, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
J Card Fail. 2007 Feb;13(1):50-5. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2006.09.003.
There are conflicting data on the usefulness of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal proBNP (NT-proBNP) in the optimization of therapy for heart failure (HF). Discordant results may be explained by the intra-individual variability of these peptides. This study evaluates the intraindividual variability of BNP and NT-proBNP and the impact of the covariates of age, sex, and renal function.
Stable HF patients attending our unit were included. Blood samples were drawn 1 hour apart on 2 occasions 1 week apart. Forty-five patients were enrolled (69.6 +/- 12.1 years, 64% male, 84% systolic HF). Within-hour and within-week intraindividual variability were: 6.9% and 21.1% for NT-proBNP; 14.6% and 28.4% for BNP (P < .01 for within-hour comparison of BNP and NT-proBNP). Reference change values over 1 week for NT-proBNP and BNP were 49.2% and 66.2%, respectively. There were no significant relationships identified between variability and age, gender, or glomerular filtration rate.
There is considerable intraindividual variability in these peptides in stable HF patients. Changes of approximately 50% and 66% for NT-proBNP and BNP from week to week are needed to indicate an altered clinical status and caution should be exercised in interpreting serial changes in these peptide levels when monitoring patient responses to treatment or clinical status.
关于B型利钠肽(BNP)和N末端脑钠肽前体(NT-proBNP)在心力衰竭(HF)治疗优化中的作用,存在相互矛盾的数据。结果不一致可能是由于这些肽的个体内变异性所致。本研究评估了BNP和NT-proBNP的个体内变异性以及年龄、性别和肾功能等协变量的影响。
纳入我院稳定的HF患者。在相隔1周的2个时间点,每隔1小时采集血样。共纳入45例患者(年龄69.6±12.1岁,男性占64%,收缩性HF占84%)。NT-proBNP的小时内和周内个体内变异性分别为6.9%和21.1%;BNP的小时内和周内个体内变异性分别为14.6%和28.4%(BNP和NT-proBNP小时内比较,P<0.01)。NT-proBNP和BNP在1周内的参考变化值分别为49.2%和66.2%。未发现变异性与年龄、性别或肾小球滤过率之间存在显著关系。
稳定HF患者中这些肽存在相当大的个体内变异性。NT-proBNP和BNP每周变化约50%和66%才能表明临床状态改变,在监测患者对治疗的反应或临床状态时,解释这些肽水平的系列变化时应谨慎。