Beaudoin Deborah L, Borghuis Bart G, Demb Jonathan B
Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105, USA.
J Neurosci. 2007 Mar 7;27(10):2636-45. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4610-06.2007.
Retinal ganglion cells fire spikes to an appropriate contrast presented over their receptive field center. These center responses undergo dynamic changes in sensitivity depending on the ongoing level of contrast, a process known as "contrast gain control." Extracellular recordings suggested that gain control is driven by a single wide-field mechanism, extending across the center and beyond, that depends on inhibitory interneurons: amacrine cells. However, recordings in salamander suggested that the excitatory bipolar cells, which drive the center, may themselves show gain control independently of amacrine cell mechanisms. Here, we tested in mammalian ganglion cells whether amacrine cells are critical for gain control over the receptive field center. We made extracellular and whole-cell recordings of guinea pig Y-type cells in vitro and quantified the gain change between contrasts using a linear-nonlinear analysis. For spikes, tripling contrast reduced gain by approximately 40%. With spikes blocked, ganglion cells showed similar levels of gain control in membrane currents and voltages and under conditions of low and high calcium buffering: tripling contrast reduced gain by approximately 20-25%. Gain control persisted under voltage-clamp conditions that minimize inhibitory conductances and pharmacological conditions that block inhibitory neurotransmitter receptors. Gain control depended on adequate stimulation, not of ganglion cells but of presynaptic bipolar cells. Furthermore, horizontal cell measurements showed a lack of gain control in photoreceptor synaptic release. Thus, the mechanism for gain control over the ganglion cell receptive field center, as measured in the subthreshold response, originates in the presynaptic bipolar cells and does not require amacrine cell signaling.
视网膜神经节细胞会向其感受野中心呈现的适当对比度发放脉冲。这些中心反应的敏感度会根据当前的对比度水平发生动态变化,这一过程被称为“对比度增益控制”。细胞外记录表明,增益控制是由一种单一的广域机制驱动的,该机制延伸至中心及以外区域,且依赖于抑制性中间神经元:无长突细胞。然而,对蝾螈的记录表明,驱动中心的兴奋性双极细胞自身可能独立于无长突细胞机制表现出增益控制。在此,我们在哺乳动物神经节细胞中测试了无长突细胞对于感受野中心增益控制是否至关重要。我们在体外对豚鼠Y型细胞进行了细胞外和全细胞记录,并使用线性 - 非线性分析量化了不同对比度之间的增益变化。对于脉冲发放,对比度增加两倍会使增益降低约40%。在脉冲发放被阻断的情况下,神经节细胞在膜电流和电压以及低钙和高钙缓冲条件下表现出相似水平的增益控制:对比度增加两倍会使增益降低约20 - 25%。在使抑制性电导最小化的电压钳制条件以及阻断抑制性神经递质受体的药理学条件下,增益控制依然存在。增益控制依赖于足够的刺激,但不是对神经节细胞的刺激,而是对突触前双极细胞的刺激。此外,水平细胞测量结果显示光感受器突触释放中不存在增益控制。因此,在阈下反应中测量到的神经节细胞感受野中心增益控制机制起源于突触前双极细胞,并不需要无长突细胞信号传导。