Davidson Jonathan R T
Department of Psychiatry, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
J Clin Psychiatry. 2007;68 Suppl 3:10-5.
The term atypical depression as a preferentially monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI)-responsive state was first introduced by West and Dally in 1959. Further characterization of this syndrome and its responsiveness to antidepressants came to occupy the attention of many psychopharmacologists for the next 30 years. Different portrayals of atypical depression have emerged, for example, nonendogenous depression, phobic anxiety with secondary depression, vegetative reversal, rejection-sensitivity, and depression with severe chronic pain. Consistency across or within types has been unimpressive, and no coherent single type of depression can yet be said to be "atypical." In successfully demonstrating superiority of MAOI drugs to tricyclics, the Columbia (or DSM-IV) criteria have established their utility and become widely adopted, but other criteria have also passed this test. In this "post-MAOI" era, no novel compound or group of drugs has been clearly shown to have good efficacy in atypical depression, leaving the treatment of atypical depression as an unmet need.
“非典型抑郁症”这一术语最初是指一种对单胺氧化酶抑制剂(MAOI)反应良好的状态,由韦斯特和达利于1959年首次提出。在接下来的30年里,这种综合征及其对抗抑郁药的反应的进一步特征吸引了许多精神药理学家的关注。出现了对非典型抑郁症的不同描述,例如,非内源性抑郁症、伴有继发性抑郁症的恐惧性焦虑、植物神经功能逆转、拒绝敏感性以及伴有严重慢性疼痛的抑郁症。不同类型之间或同一类型内部的一致性并不显著,目前还不能说有一种连贯统一的单一抑郁症类型就是“非典型的”。在成功证明MAOI药物优于三环类药物方面,哥伦比亚(或《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版)标准已确立了其效用并被广泛采用,但其他标准也通过了这一检验。在这个“MAOI后”时代,尚无新的化合物或药物组被明确证明对非典型抑郁症有良好疗效,因此非典型抑郁症的治疗仍存在未满足的需求。