Lund Maria Larsson, Fisher Anne G, Lexell Jan, Bernspång Birgitta
Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Occupational Therapy, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
J Rehabil Med. 2007 Mar;39(2):156-62. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0031.
To evaluate aspects of internal scale validity and reliability of the Swedish version of the Impact on Participation and Autonomy questionnaire (IPA-S) for use in people with spinal cord injury.
A total of 161 persons with spinal cord injury.
IPA-S psychometric properties were evaluated using Rasch rating scale analysis.
The results show that the IPA-S has 27 items for perceived participation and 6 items for perceived problems with participation, indicating 2 underlying unidimensional constructs for use in people with spinal cord injury, after removal of misfitting items. The established hierarchical order of the item calibration values in both scales appeared logical and the distances between the items, with a few exceptions in the problem scale, were appropriate. Both scales demonstrated good separation reliability. The range of item calibration values in both scales did not fully cover the range of measures of persons' perceived participation and problems thereof.
The psychometric properties of IPA-S are promising and indicate that IPA-S has potential to be developed further.
评估瑞典版参与和自主影响问卷(IPA-S)在脊髓损伤患者中使用时的内部量表效度和信度。
共161名脊髓损伤患者。
使用拉施评分量表分析评估IPA-S的心理测量特性。
结果显示,IPA-S有27项关于感知参与的条目和6项关于参与问题感知的条目,在去除不匹配条目后,表明脊髓损伤患者存在两个潜在的单维结构。两个量表中条目的校准值所建立的层次顺序似乎合理,条目之间的距离(问题量表中有少数例外)合适。两个量表均显示出良好的区分信度。两个量表中条目的校准值范围未完全涵盖患者感知参与及其问题的测量范围。
IPA-S的心理测量特性很有前景,表明IPA-S有进一步开发的潜力。