• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

现实政治与公平程序:群体认同对政治决策接受度的调节作用

Realpolitik versus fair process: moderating effects of group identification on acceptance of political decisions.

作者信息

Leung Kwok, Tong Kwok-Kit, Lind E Allan

机构信息

Department of Management, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China.

出版信息

J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 Mar;92(3):476-89. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.3.476.

DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.92.3.476
PMID:17352604
Abstract

Three studies examined the effects of perceived procedural justice and the favorability of a group-level outcome on the endorsement of a group-level decision and the evaluation of the authority responsible for the decision. Results showed that, contrary to findings usually seen with individual-level decisions, collective outcome favorability was more important than procedural justice in influencing the endorsement of the decision. Furthermore, increased identification with the group reduced the importance of procedural justice but accentuated the importance of collective outcome favorability. With regard to the evaluation of the authority, the results were similar to those obtained in individual-level decisions: Procedural fairness mattered more than collective outcome favorability.

摘要

三项研究考察了感知到的程序公正以及群体层面结果的有利程度对群体层面决策的认可和对负责该决策的权威的评价的影响。结果表明,与通常在个体层面决策中看到的结果相反,在影响对决策的认可方面,集体结果的有利程度比程序公正更为重要。此外,对群体认同感的增强降低了程序公正的重要性,但突出了集体结果有利程度的重要性。关于对权威的评价,结果与在个体层面决策中获得的结果相似:程序公平比集体结果的有利程度更重要。

相似文献

1
Realpolitik versus fair process: moderating effects of group identification on acceptance of political decisions.现实政治与公平程序:群体认同对政治决策接受度的调节作用
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 Mar;92(3):476-89. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.3.476.
2
The role of societal benefits and fairness concerns among decision makers and decision recipients.决策者和决策接受者之间社会利益和公平问题的作用。
Law Hum Behav. 2007 Dec;31(6):573-610. doi: 10.1007/s10979-006-9084-2. Epub 2007 Jan 24.
3
Procedural fairness, outcome favorability, and judgments of an authority's responsibility.程序公平、结果有利性与对权威责任的判断。
J Appl Psychol. 2007 Nov;92(6):1657-71. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1657.
4
Substitutes for procedural fairness: prototypical leaders are endorsed whether they are fair or not.程序公平的替代物:典型领导者无论是否公平都会得到认可。
J Appl Psychol. 2009 Jan;94(1):235-44. doi: 10.1037/a0012936.
5
Voice in political decision-making: the effect of group voice on perceived trustworthiness of decision makers and subsequent acceptance of decisions.政治决策中的声音:群体声音对决策者可信度的感知以及对后续决策的接受程度的影响。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2010 Jun;16(2):173-86. doi: 10.1037/a0019977.
6
Does the justice of the one interact with the justice of the many? Reactions to procedural justice in teams.个体的公正与群体的公正相互作用吗?团队对程序公正的反应。
J Appl Psychol. 2004 Aug;89(4):633-46. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.89.4.633.
7
Procedural justice as autonomy regulation.作为自主性调节的程序正义
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 Jun;96(6):1166-80. doi: 10.1037/a0014153.
8
The effects of trust in authority and procedural fairness on cooperation.对权威的信任和程序公平对合作的影响。
J Appl Psychol. 2007 May;92(3):639-49. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.3.639.
9
Procedural justice climate and group power distance: an examination of cross-level interaction effects.程序正义氛围与群体权力距离:跨层次交互效应考察
J Appl Psychol. 2007 May;92(3):681-92. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.3.681.
10
The other side of injustice: when unfair procedures increase group-serving behavior.不公正的另一面:当不公平程序增加群体服务行为时。
Psychol Sci. 2009 Aug;20(8):1026-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02404.x. Epub 2009 Jul 8.

引用本文的文献

1
(In)justice in academia: procedural fairness, students' academic identification, and perceived legitimacy of university authorities.学术界的(不)公正:程序公平、学生的学术认同以及对大学当局的感知合法性
High Educ (Dordr). 2022 Aug 8:1-22. doi: 10.1007/s10734-022-00907-8.
2
Perceived procedural justice and psychological flourishing among mental health professionals in Macao: a moderated mediation model.澳门心理健康专业人员的程序公平感与心理幸福感:一个有调节的中介模型。
Int J Educ Vocat Guid. 2022 Apr 26:1-21. doi: 10.1007/s10775-022-09541-3.
3
Everyday Interactions with University Authorities: Authority Treatment Quality, Outcome Favorability and First-Year Students' University Adjustment.
与大学管理部门的日常互动:管理待遇质量、结果满意度与一年级学生的大学适应情况
Group Process Intergroup Relat. 2009 Mar 1;12(2):209-226. doi: 10.1177/1368430208101057.