Leung Kwok, Tong Kwok-Kit, Lind E Allan
Department of Management, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 Mar;92(3):476-89. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.3.476.
Three studies examined the effects of perceived procedural justice and the favorability of a group-level outcome on the endorsement of a group-level decision and the evaluation of the authority responsible for the decision. Results showed that, contrary to findings usually seen with individual-level decisions, collective outcome favorability was more important than procedural justice in influencing the endorsement of the decision. Furthermore, increased identification with the group reduced the importance of procedural justice but accentuated the importance of collective outcome favorability. With regard to the evaluation of the authority, the results were similar to those obtained in individual-level decisions: Procedural fairness mattered more than collective outcome favorability.
三项研究考察了感知到的程序公正以及群体层面结果的有利程度对群体层面决策的认可和对负责该决策的权威的评价的影响。结果表明,与通常在个体层面决策中看到的结果相反,在影响对决策的认可方面,集体结果的有利程度比程序公正更为重要。此外,对群体认同感的增强降低了程序公正的重要性,但突出了集体结果有利程度的重要性。关于对权威的评价,结果与在个体层面决策中获得的结果相似:程序公平比集体结果的有利程度更重要。