Suppr超能文献

程序公平的替代物:典型领导者无论是否公平都会得到认可。

Substitutes for procedural fairness: prototypical leaders are endorsed whether they are fair or not.

作者信息

Ullrich Johannes, Christ Oliver, van Dick Rolf

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Goethe University, Germany.

出版信息

J Appl Psychol. 2009 Jan;94(1):235-44. doi: 10.1037/a0012936.

Abstract

This article extends research on leader procedural fairness as well as the social identity model of leadership effectiveness (SIMOL) by demonstrating that leader prototypicality can act as a substitute for procedural fairness. Although procedural fairness in general and voice in particular have been found to have a robust positive influence on leader endorsement, the authors showed in an experimental scenario study and a correlational field study that the influence of voice on leader endorsement is substantially reduced when leaders are perceived as prototypical for the group that they lead and followers are highly identified with their group. Additionally, supportive of predictions of the SIMOL, leader prototypicality interacted with follower identification in predicting leader endorsement, such that prototypicality had a positive effect on leader endorsement, which was enhanced among high identifiers. Overall, these results suggest that leaders who are attuned to their followers' group identity can afford to go it alone, for the better or the worse. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2009 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

本文通过证明领导者原型性可以替代程序公平,扩展了对领导者程序公平以及领导效能社会认同模型(SIMOL)的研究。尽管总体上程序公平尤其是表达意见已被发现对领导者认可有强大的积极影响,但作者在一项实验情景研究和一项相关实地研究中表明,当领导者被视为其所领导群体的典型代表且追随者高度认同其群体时,表达意见对领导者认可的影响会大幅降低。此外,支持SIMOL的预测,领导者原型性在预测领导者认可时与追随者认同相互作用,即原型性对领导者认可有积极影响,在高度认同者中这种影响会增强。总体而言,这些结果表明,与追随者群体身份相契合的领导者无论好坏都可以独自行动。(《心理学文摘数据库记录》(c)2009美国心理学会,保留所有权利)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验