McCullough Michael E, Bono Giacomo, Root Lindsey M
Department of Psychology, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL 33124-0751, USA.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 Mar;92(3):490-505. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.3.490.
In 3 studies, the authors investigated whether within-persons increases in rumination about an interpersonal transgression were associated with within-persons reductions in forgiveness. Results supported this hypothesis. The association of transient increases in rumination with transient reductions in forgiveness appeared to be mediated by anger, but not fear, toward the transgressor. The association of rumination and forgiveness was not confounded by daily fluctuations in positive affect and negative affect, and it was not moderated by trait levels of positive affectivity, negative affectivity, or perceived hurtfulness of the transgression. Cross-lagged associations of rumination and forgiveness in Study 3 more consistently supported the proposition that increased rumination precedes reductions in forgiveness than the proposition that increased forgiveness precedes reductions in rumination.
在3项研究中,作者调查了个体对人际冒犯的沉思增加是否与个体宽恕的减少有关。结果支持了这一假设。沉思的短暂增加与宽恕的短暂减少之间的关联似乎是由对冒犯者的愤怒而非恐惧介导的。沉思与宽恕之间的关联并未受到积极情绪和消极情绪每日波动的混淆,也未受到积极情感性、消极情感性的特质水平或冒犯的感知伤害性的调节。研究3中沉思与宽恕的交叉滞后关联更一致地支持了这样一种观点,即沉思增加先于宽恕减少,而不是宽恕增加先于沉思减少。