Meduri G U, Wunderink R G, Leeper K V, Beals D H
Department of Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis.
Chest. 1992 Feb;101(2):500-8. doi: 10.1378/chest.101.2.500.
We conducted a prospective study to determine the effectiveness of protected bronchoalveolar lavage (PBAL) in diagnosing pneumonia in ventilated patients and the usefulness of bronchoscopic data in treating ventilated patients. Entrance criteria were (1) fever and a new or progressive infiltrate on chest roentgenogram with either leukocytosis or a macroscopically purulent tracheal aspirate, and (2) no antibiotic therapy for at least 48 h before bronchoscopy. Twenty-five ventilated patients met entrance criteria for the study and completed the protocol. PBAL was effective in retrieving distal airway secretions with a minimal degree of contamination as indicated by a specificity and a negative predictive value of 100 percent. Bacterial isolates grew in all patients with pneumonia at a concentration greater than or equal to 100,000 cfu/ml, with a median growth of 500,000 cfu/ml. The presence of a two-log difference between the highest quantitative culture count in patients without pneumonia and the lowest quantitative culture count in patients with pneumonia allowed a clearer determination of a patient's status, with regard to pneumonia, compared with the significant overlap in unprotected BAL. Gram and Giemsa stains of the PBAL were positive in all patients with pneumonia and negative in those without pneumonia. All but one patient with pneumonia received narrow-spectrum antibiotic therapy. All patients without infection had no antibiotic administered. Clinical and roentgenographic criteria could not discriminate between patients with and without pneumonia, confirming the findings of previous investigations. The results of microscopic and culture analyses of the PBAL effluent proved useful in directing antibiotic treatment in patients with pneumonia and in avoiding unnecessary antibiotic use in those patients without pneumonia.
我们进行了一项前瞻性研究,以确定保护性支气管肺泡灌洗(PBAL)在诊断机械通气患者肺炎中的有效性,以及支气管镜检查数据在治疗机械通气患者中的实用性。入选标准为:(1)发热,胸部X线片出现新的或进展性浸润影,伴有白细胞增多或气管吸出物肉眼可见脓性;(2)在支气管镜检查前至少48小时未接受抗生素治疗。25例机械通气患者符合该研究的入选标准并完成了研究方案。PBAL在获取远端气道分泌物方面有效,污染程度最小,其特异性和阴性预测值均为100%。所有肺炎患者的细菌分离株生长浓度均大于或等于100,000 cfu/ml,中位生长浓度为500,000 cfu/ml。无肺炎患者的最高定量培养计数与肺炎患者的最低定量培养计数之间存在两个对数级的差异,与未保护的支气管肺泡灌洗(BAL)中显著重叠的情况相比,这使得能够更清楚地确定患者是否患有肺炎。PBAL的革兰氏染色和吉姆萨染色在所有肺炎患者中均为阳性,在无肺炎患者中均为阴性。除1例肺炎患者外,所有肺炎患者均接受了窄谱抗生素治疗。所有未感染患者均未使用抗生素。临床和影像学标准无法区分有肺炎和无肺炎的患者,这证实了先前研究的结果。PBAL流出液的显微镜检查和培养分析结果被证明有助于指导肺炎患者的抗生素治疗,并避免对无肺炎患者不必要地使用抗生素。