• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

长期护理中质量结果的定义与衡量。

Defining and measuring quality outcomes in long-term care.

作者信息

Mor Vincent

机构信息

Department of Community Health and Center for Gerontology and Health Care Research, Brown University School of Medicine, Providence, RI 02192, USA.

出版信息

J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2007 Mar;8(3 Suppl 2):e129-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2006.12.014.

DOI:10.1016/j.jamda.2006.12.014
PMID:17352977
Abstract

The US health care industry increasingly agrees that sharing information about quality of care is necessary to stimulate providers' efforts to improve the quality of health care. The availability of mandated, uniform clinical data in all nursing homes and home health agencies has facilitated the rapid adoption of public reporting of comparative quality data. This paper examines the conceptual and technical challenges underlying the application of information about long-term care provider quality to judge and compare the quality of care provided by nursing homes and home health agencies. In general, the impetus to apply the emerging set of quality "tools" based on mandated clinical assessments may have outstripped the evidence for their valid application in selecting top providers or for rewarding their superior performance.

摘要

美国医疗行业越来越认同,分享医疗质量信息对于激励医疗服务提供者努力提高医疗质量是必要的。所有疗养院和家庭健康机构都有法定的统一临床数据,这促进了比较质量数据公开报告的迅速采用。本文探讨了将长期护理服务提供者质量信息用于评判和比较疗养院及家庭健康机构所提供护理质量时所面临的概念和技术挑战。总体而言,基于法定临床评估应用这套新兴质量“工具”的推动力,可能已经超过了其在挑选顶尖服务提供者或奖励其卓越表现方面有效应用的证据。

相似文献

1
Defining and measuring quality outcomes in long-term care.长期护理中质量结果的定义与衡量。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2007 Mar;8(3 Suppl 2):e129-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2006.12.014.
2
Defining and measuring quality outcomes in long-term care.定义和衡量长期护理中的质量结果。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2006 Oct;7(8):532-8; discussion 538-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2006.08.001.
3
Improving the quality of long-term care with better information.利用更完善的信息提升长期护理质量。
Milbank Q. 2005;83(3):333-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00405.x.
4
Benchmarking and quality in residential and nursing homes: lessons from the US.养老院和疗养院的基准评估与质量:来自美国的经验教训。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2003 Mar;18(3):258-66. doi: 10.1002/gps.821.
5
Improving nursing home quality of care through outcomes data: the MDS quality indicators.通过结果数据改善养老院护理质量:最低数据集质量指标
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2003 Mar;18(3):250-7. doi: 10.1002/gps.820.
6
Development of a risk-adjusted urinary incontinence outcome measure of quality for nursing homes.养老院尿失禁质量风险调整结局指标的开发。
Med Care. 2003 Apr;41(4):467-78. doi: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000053227.95476.02.
7
The U.S. Veterans Administration health care delivery system: one health care system's approach to quality assurance in long-term care.
Dan Med Bull. 1987 Oct;Suppl 5:54-60.
8
Advancing nursing home quality through quality improvement itself.通过质量改进本身提高养老院的质量。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Jan-Feb;29(1):81-6. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0555.
9
Risk adjustment and public reporting on home health care.家庭医疗保健的风险调整与公开报告。
Health Care Financ Rev. 2007 Spring;28(3):77-94.
10
Comparing states' Medicaid nursing facilities and home and community-based services long-term care programs: quality and fit with inclination, capacity, and need.比较各州医疗补助计划下的护理机构以及基于家庭和社区的长期护理服务项目:质量以及与倾向、能力和需求的匹配度。
J Aging Soc Policy. 2009 Jan-Mar;21(1):52-74. doi: 10.1080/08959420802539381.

引用本文的文献

1
Identifying the Service Capability of Long-Term Care Facilities in China: An e-Delphi Study.中国长期护理机构服务能力识别:一项电子德尔菲研究。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jun 29;10:884514. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.884514. eCollection 2022.
2
Assessing Nursing Homes Quality Indicators' Between-Provider Variability and Reliability: A Cross-Sectional Study Using ICCs and Rankability.评估养老院质量指标的提供者间变异性和可靠性:使用 ICC 和可排序性的横断面研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 10;17(24):9249. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17249249.
3
Patient-reported experience measures are essential to improving quality of care for chronic wounds: An international qualitative study.
患者报告的体验测量对于改善慢性伤口护理质量至关重要:一项国际定性研究。
Int Wound J. 2020 Aug;17(4):1052-1061. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13374. Epub 2020 Apr 21.
4
How to assess experienced quality of care in nursing homes from the client's perspective: results of a qualitative study.如何从客户的角度评估养老院的经验护理质量:一项定性研究的结果。
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Feb 17;20(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-1466-7.
5
Quality measurement and nursing homes: measuring what matters.质量评估与疗养院:衡量重要之事
BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 Jul;28(7):520-523. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009447. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
6
Understanding and benchmarking health service achievement of policy goals for chronic disease.理解和基准化慢性病政策目标的卫生服务成就。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Sep 29;12:343. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-343.
7
Temporal and Geographic variation in the validity and internal consistency of the Nursing Home Resident Assessment Minimum Data Set 2.0.养老院居民评估最低数据集中 2.0 的有效性和内部一致性的时间和地理变化。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Apr 15;11:78. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-78.
8
Not so black and white: nursing home concentration of Hispanics associated with prevalence of pressure ulcers.并非如此简单:西班牙裔居民在养老院的集中程度与压疮患病率相关。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2009 Feb;10(2):127-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2008.08.015. Epub 2008 Dec 20.
9
Does risk adjustment of the CMS quality measures for nursing homes matter?医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)针对疗养院的质量衡量标准进行风险调整重要吗?
Med Care. 2008 May;46(5):532-41. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31816099c5.