Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars Program, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Int Wound J. 2020 Aug;17(4):1052-1061. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13374. Epub 2020 Apr 21.
Traditional quality measures for chronic wounds have focused on objective outcomes that are challenging to risk adjust, lack patient input, and have limited ability to inform quality improvement interventions. Patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) provide information from the patient perspective regarding health care quality and have potential to improve patient-centredness, increase care efficiency, and generate actionable data for quality improvement. The purpose of this study was to understand patient experiences and health care processes that impact quality of care among patients with chronic wounds. Sixty patients at least 18 years of age with various wound aetiologies were recruited from Canada, Denmark, The Netherlands, and the United States as part of a larger phase 1 qualitative study to develop a patient-reported outcome measure for chronic wounds (WOUND-Q). All patients had a chronic wound for at least 3 months, were fluent in their native speaking language, and able to participate in a one-on-one semi-structured interview. Interviews were digitally recorded and transcribed verbatim. Interpretive description was used to identify recurrent themes relating to patient experience and quality of care. We identified five domains (care coordination, establishing/obtaining care, information delivery, patient-provider interaction, and treatment delivery) and 21 sub-domains (access to patient information, interdisciplinary communication, encounter efficiency, provider availability, specialist referral, staff professionalism, travel/convenience, modality, reciprocity, understandability/consistency, accountability, continuity, credentials, rapport, appropriateness, complication management, continuity, environment/setting, equipment and supply needs, expectation, and patient-centred) as potential opportunities to measure and improve quality of care in the chronic wound population. PREMs for chronic wounds represent an important opportunity to engage patients and longitudinally assess quality across clinical settings and providers. Future research should focus on developing PREMs to complement traditional objective and patient-reported outcome measures for chronic wounds.
传统的慢性伤口质量衡量标准侧重于客观结果,这些结果难以进行风险调整,缺乏患者的投入,并且改进质量的干预措施的能力有限。患者报告的体验测量(PROMs)从患者角度提供有关医疗质量的信息,并且有可能提高以患者为中心的程度,提高护理效率,并为质量改进生成可操作的数据。本研究的目的是了解影响慢性伤口患者护理质量的患者体验和医疗流程。作为开发慢性伤口患者报告结局测量工具(WOUND-Q)的更大的 1 期定性研究的一部分,从加拿大、丹麦、荷兰和美国招募了至少 18 岁且具有各种伤口病因的 60 名慢性伤口患者。所有患者的慢性伤口至少持续 3 个月,其母语流利,并且能够参加一对一的半结构化访谈。访谈以数字方式记录并逐字转录。解释性描述用于识别与患者体验和护理质量相关的反复出现的主题。我们确定了五个领域(护理协调、建立/获得护理、信息传递、医患互动和治疗提供)和 21 个子领域(访问患者信息、跨学科沟通、就诊效率、提供者可用性、专科转诊、员工专业精神、旅行/便利、模式、互惠、可理解性/一致性、问责制、连续性、凭证、融洽关系、适当性、并发症管理、连续性、环境/设置、设备和供应需求、期望和以患者为中心),作为衡量和改善慢性伤口患者护理质量的潜在机会。慢性伤口的 PROMs 代表了一个重要的机会,可以让患者参与进来,并在整个临床环境和提供者中进行纵向评估质量。未来的研究应侧重于开发 PROMs,以补充慢性伤口的传统客观和患者报告的结局测量。