Leonhardt Asa, Bergström Christina, Krok Lena, Cardaropoli Giuseppe
Department of Periodontology, Specialist Dental Clinic, Mölndal Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden.
Acta Odontol Scand. 2007 Feb;65(1):52-9. doi: 10.1080/00016350600973078.
Instrumentation of the subgingival area is aimed at removing as much as possible of the bacterial biofilm and subgingival calculus. Since mechanical root debridement is a technically demanding procedure, antiseptics and antibiotics delivered either locally or systemically have been used as adjunct to scaling and root-planning procedures in order to control the subgingival biofilm and thereby enhance the treatment outcome. Our aim was to study the microbiological effect of ultrasonic debridement with or without povidone-iodine (PVP-iodine) in the treatment of severe chronic periodontitis.
Twenty patients were recruited to the study. Each test site and the related quadrant were randomly assigned to one of four different treatment modalities: ultrasonic scaling+subgingival irrigation with 0.5% PVP-iodine for 5 min/tooth, ultrasonic scaling+subgingival irrigation with sterile saline solution for 5 min/tooth, subgingival irrigation with sterile saline solution for 5 min/tooth and subgingival irrigation with 0.5% PVP-iodine for 5 min/tooth. The individuals were followed longitudinally for 6 months.
The present study showed that non-surgical periodontal therapy with the use of an ultrasonic device was effective in reducing the analyzed putative periodontal bacteria. No statistically significant difference between ultrasonic+saline and ultrasonic+PVP-iodine was found.
Ultrasonic debridement reduced the periodontal markers in patients with severe chronic periodontitis. The reduction was selective. A concentration of 0.5% PVP-iodine did not add any anti-microbiological effect compared to ultrasonic debridement alone.
龈下区域的器械操作旨在尽可能多地清除细菌生物膜和龈下牙石。由于机械性根面清创术是一项技术要求较高的操作,因此局部或全身使用的防腐剂和抗生素已被用作龈上洁治和根面平整术的辅助手段,以控制龈下生物膜,从而提高治疗效果。我们的目的是研究超声清创联合或不联合聚维酮碘(PVP-碘)治疗重度慢性牙周炎的微生物学效果。
招募20名患者参与本研究。每个测试部位及其相关象限被随机分配到四种不同治疗方式中的一种:超声洁治+用0.5% PVP-碘龈下冲洗5分钟/牙、超声洁治+用无菌盐溶液龈下冲洗5分钟/牙、用无菌盐溶液龈下冲洗5分钟/牙以及用0.5% PVP-碘龈下冲洗5分钟/牙。对这些个体进行了为期6个月的纵向随访。
本研究表明,使用超声设备进行的非手术牙周治疗在减少所分析的假定牙周细菌方面是有效的。超声+盐水组和超声+PVP-碘组之间未发现统计学上的显著差异。
超声清创降低了重度慢性牙周炎患者的牙周指标。这种降低具有选择性。与单独的超声清创相比,0.5% PVP-碘的浓度并未增加任何抗微生物效果。