Girard Timothy D, Bernard Gordon R
Division of Allergy, Pulmonary, and Critical Care Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN.
Division of Allergy, Pulmonary, and Critical Care Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN.
Chest. 2007 Mar;131(3):921-929. doi: 10.1378/chest.06-1515.
Mechanical ventilation is an essential component of the care of patients with ARDS, and a large number of randomized controlled clinical trials have now been conducted evaluating the efficacy and safety of various methods of mechanical ventilation for the treatment of ARDS. Low tidal volume ventilation (</= 6 mL/kg predicted body weight) should be utilized in all patients with ARDS as it is the only method of mechanical ventilation that, to date, has been shown to improve survival. High positive end-expiratory pressure, alveolar recruitment maneuvers, and prone positioning may each be useful as rescue therapy in a patient with severe hypoxemia, but these methods of ventilation do not improve survival for the wide population of patients with ARDS. Although not specific to the treatment of ARDS, protocol-driven weaning that utilizes a daily spontaneous breathing trial and ventilation in the semirecumbent position have proven benefits and should be used in the management of ARDS patients.
机械通气是急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者治疗的重要组成部分,目前已经开展了大量随机对照临床试验,评估各种机械通气方法治疗ARDS的疗效和安全性。所有ARDS患者均应采用低潮气量通气(≤6 mL/kg预计体重),因为这是迄今为止唯一已被证明可提高生存率的机械通气方法。高呼气末正压、肺泡复张手法和俯卧位通气在重度低氧血症患者中均可作为挽救治疗手段,但这些通气方法并不能提高广大ARDS患者的生存率。虽然并非ARDS治疗所特有,但采用每日自主呼吸试验和半卧位通气的方案驱动撤机已被证明有益,应在ARDS患者的管理中使用。