Ma H-M, Lu Y-C, Kwok T-G, Ho F-Y, Huang C-Y, Huang C-H
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mackay Memorial Hospital, 92 Sec.Z, Chung-Shan N. Road, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China.
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007 Mar;89(3):408-12. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.89B3.18276.
One of the most controversial issues in total knee replacement is whether or not to resurface the patella. In order to determine the effects of different designs of femoral component on the conformity of the patellofemoral joint, five different knee prostheses were investigated. These were Low Contact Stress, the Miller-Galante II, the NexGen, the Porous-Coated Anatomic, and the Total Condylar prostheses. Three-dimensional models of the prostheses and a native patella were developed and assessed by computer. The conformity of the curvature of the five different prosthetic femoral components to their corresponding patellar implants and to the native patella at different angles of flexion was assessed by measuring the angles of intersection of tangential lines. The Total Condylar prosthesis had the lowest conformity with the native patella (mean 8.58 degrees ; 0.14 degrees to 29.9 degrees ) and with its own patellar component (mean 11.36 degrees ; 0.55 degrees to 39.19 degrees ). In the other four prostheses, the conformity was better (mean 2.25 degrees ; 0.02 degrees to 10.52 degrees ) when articulated with the corresponding patellar component. The Porous-Coated Anatomic femoral component showed better conformity (mean 6.51 degrees ; 0.07 degrees to 9.89 degrees ) than the Miller-Galante II prosthesis (mean 11.20 degrees ; 5.80 degrees to 16.72 degrees ) when tested with the native patella. Although the Nexgen prosthesis had less conformity with the native patella at a low angle of flexion, this improved at mid (mean 3.57 degrees ; 1.40 degrees to 4.56 degrees ) or high angles of flexion (mean 4.54 degrees ; 0.91 degrees to 9.39 degrees ), respectively. The Low Contact Stress femoral component had the best conformity with the native patella (mean 2.39 degrees ; 0.04 degrees to 4.56 degrees ). There was no significant difference (p > 0.208) between the conformity when tested with the native patella or its own patellar component at any angle of flexion. The geometry of the anterior flange of a femoral component affects the conformity of the patellofemoral joint when articulating with the native patella. A more anatomical design of femoral component is preferable if the surgeon decides not to resurface the patella at the time of operation.
全膝关节置换术中最具争议的问题之一是是否对髌骨进行表面置换。为了确定不同设计的股骨部件对髌股关节匹配度的影响,研究了五种不同的膝关节假体。它们分别是低接触应力型、米勒 - 加兰特二代、奈杰恩、多孔涂层解剖型和全髁型假体。通过计算机建立了假体和天然髌骨的三维模型并进行评估。通过测量切线的交角,评估了五种不同假体股骨部件在不同屈曲角度下与相应髌骨植入物以及天然髌骨的曲率匹配度。全髁型假体与天然髌骨的匹配度最低(平均8.58度;0.14度至29.9度),与自身髌骨部件的匹配度也最低(平均11.36度;0.55度至39.19度)。在其他四种假体中,与相应髌骨部件铰接时匹配度更好(平均2.25度;0.02度至10.52度)。当与天然髌骨测试时,多孔涂层解剖型股骨部件的匹配度(平均6.51度;0.07度至9.89度)优于米勒 - 加兰特二代假体(平均11.20度;5.80度至16.72度)。尽管奈杰恩假体在低屈曲角度下与天然髌骨的匹配度较低,但在中(平均3.57度;1.40度至4.56度)或高屈曲角度(平均4.54度;0.91度至9.39度)时分别有所改善。低接触应力型股骨部件与天然髌骨的匹配度最佳(平均2.39度;0.04度至4.56度)。在任何屈曲角度下,与天然髌骨或其自身髌骨部件测试时的匹配度之间均无显著差异(p > 0.208)。股骨部件前凸缘的几何形状在与天然髌骨铰接时会影响髌股关节的匹配度。如果外科医生在手术时决定不对髌骨进行表面置换,那么采用更符合解剖结构设计的股骨部件会更好。