• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

慢性病照护模式协作能否降低糖尿病患者的心脏病风险?

Can a chronic care model collaborative reduce heart disease risk in patients with diabetes?

作者信息

Vargas Roberto B, Mangione Carol M, Asch Steven, Keesey Joan, Rosen Mayde, Schonlau Matthias, Keeler Emmett B

机构信息

Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Feb;22(2):215-22. doi: 10.1007/s11606-006-0072-5.

DOI:10.1007/s11606-006-0072-5
PMID:17356989
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1824758/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is a need to identify effective practical interventions to decrease cardiovascular disease risk in patients with diabetes.

OBJECTIVE

We examine the impact of participation in a collaborative implementing the chronic care model (CCM) on the reduction of cardiovascular disease risk in patients with diabetes.

DESIGN

Controlled pre- and postintervention study.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Persons with diabetes receiving care at 13 health care organizations exposed to the CCM collaborative and controls receiving care in nonexposed sites.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Ten-year risk of cardiovascular disease; determined using a modified United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study risk engine score. A total number of 613 patients from CCM intervention sites and 557 patients from usual care control sites met the inclusion criteria. The baseline mean 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease was 31% for both the intervention group and the control group. Participants in both groups had improved blood pressure, lipid levels, and HbA1c levels during the observation period. Random intercept hierarchical regression models showed that the intervention group had a 2.1% (95% CI -3.7%, -0.5%) greater reduction in predicted risk for future cardiovascular events when compared to the control group. This would result in a reduced risk of one cardiovascular disease event for every 48 patients exposed to the intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Over a 1-year interval, this collaborative intervention using the CCM lowered the cardiovascular disease risk factors of patients with diabetes who were cared for in the participating organization's settings. Further work could enhance the impact of this promising multifactorial intervention on cardiovascular disease risk reduction.

摘要

背景

需要确定有效的实际干预措施,以降低糖尿病患者患心血管疾病的风险。

目的

我们研究参与实施慢性病护理模式(CCM)的协作对降低糖尿病患者心血管疾病风险的影响。

设计

干预前后对照研究。

患者/参与者:在13个接受CCM协作的医疗机构接受护理的糖尿病患者,以及在未接受该协作的医疗机构接受护理的对照组患者。

测量指标和主要结果

心血管疾病的10年风险;使用改良的英国前瞻性糖尿病研究风险评估工具进行测定。来自CCM干预组的613例患者和来自常规护理对照组的557例患者符合纳入标准。干预组和对照组的基线心血管疾病10年平均风险均为31%。在观察期内,两组参与者的血压、血脂水平和糖化血红蛋白水平均有所改善。随机截距分层回归模型显示,与对照组相比,干预组未来心血管事件的预测风险降低幅度高2.1%(95%CI -3.7%,-0.5%)。这意味着每48例接受干预的患者中,心血管疾病事件风险会降低一例。

结论

在1年的时间间隔内,这种采用CCM的协作干预降低了在参与机构接受护理的糖尿病患者的心血管疾病风险因素。进一步的工作可以增强这种有前景的多因素干预对降低心血管疾病风险的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db30/2227975/013bc7eb0c9e/11606_2006_72_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db30/2227975/adb4fce6ad7d/11606_2006_72_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db30/2227975/013bc7eb0c9e/11606_2006_72_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db30/2227975/adb4fce6ad7d/11606_2006_72_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db30/2227975/013bc7eb0c9e/11606_2006_72_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Can a chronic care model collaborative reduce heart disease risk in patients with diabetes?慢性病照护模式协作能否降低糖尿病患者的心脏病风险?
J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Feb;22(2):215-22. doi: 10.1007/s11606-006-0072-5.
2
Cost-effectiveness analysis of adding pharmacists to primary care teams to reduce cardiovascular risk in patients with Type 2 diabetes: results from a randomized controlled trial.在基层医疗团队中增加药剂师以降低2型糖尿病患者心血管风险的成本效益分析:一项随机对照试验的结果
Diabet Med. 2015 Jul;32(7):899-906. doi: 10.1111/dme.12692. Epub 2015 Feb 2.
3
Pharmacist-physician collaboration for diabetes care: cardiovascular outcomes.药师-医师合作进行糖尿病护理:心血管结局。
Ann Pharmacother. 2013 Nov;47(11):1471-7. doi: 10.1177/1060028013504738.
4
Cost-effectiveness of a quality improvement collaborative focusing on patients with diabetes.关注糖尿病患者的质量改进合作的成本效益。
Med Care. 2010 Oct;48(10):884-91. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181eb318f.
5
A pharmacist care program: positive impact on cardiac risk in patients with type 2 diabetes.药师护理方案:对 2 型糖尿病患者心脏风险的积极影响。
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2012 Mar;17(1):57-64. doi: 10.1177/1074248410396216. Epub 2011 Feb 18.
6
Predicting the impact of population level risk reduction in cardio-vascular disease and stroke on acute hospital admission rates over a 5 year period--a pilot study.预测5年内心血管疾病和中风的人群水平风险降低对急性住院率的影响——一项试点研究。
Public Health. 2006 Dec;120(12):1140-8. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2006.10.012. Epub 2006 Nov 3.
7
Contemporary model for cardiovascular risk prediction in people with type 2 diabetes.2型糖尿病患者心血管风险预测的当代模型。
Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2011 Jun;18(3):393-8. doi: 10.1177/1741826710394270. Epub 2011 Feb 28.
8
Cardiovascular risk factors in type 2 diabetic patients: multifactorial intervention in primary care.2型糖尿病患者的心血管危险因素:基层医疗中的多因素干预
Kidney Int Suppl. 2005 Jan(93):S55-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.09313.x.
9
The Diabetes Shared Care Program and Risks of Cardiovascular Events in Type 2 Diabetes.2 型糖尿病的糖尿病共同照护计划与心血管事件风险
Am J Med. 2015 Sep;128(9):977-85.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2015.03.025. Epub 2015 Apr 20.
10
Cardiovascular risk education and social support (CaRESS): report of a randomized controlled trial from the Kentucky Ambulatory Network (KAN).
J Am Board Fam Med. 2008 Jul-Aug;21(4):269-81. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2008.04.080007.

引用本文的文献

1
The long-term general practice healthcare of women with a history of gestational diabetes: A Scoping Review Protocol.有妊娠期糖尿病病史女性的长期全科医疗保健:一项范围综述方案。
HRB Open Res. 2025 Apr 10;8:31. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.14022.2. eCollection 2025.
2
Validating the diagnostic accuracy of medical certification: a population-level comparison between verbal autopsy and Saudi medical records causes of death of deceased with type 2 diabetes.验证医学认证的诊断准确性:2型糖尿病死者的口头尸检与沙特医疗记录死因之间的人群水平比较。
Glob Health Action. 2024 Dec 31;17(1):2448382. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2024.2448382. Epub 2025 Jan 20.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Translating the chronic care model into the community: results from a randomized controlled trial of a multifaceted diabetes care intervention.将慢性病照护模式引入社区:一项多方面糖尿病照护干预随机对照试验的结果
Diabetes Care. 2006 Apr;29(4):811-7. doi: 10.2337/diacare.29.04.06.dc05-1785.
2
Assessing the implementation of the chronic care model in quality improvement collaboratives.评估慢性病照护模式在质量改进协作中的实施情况。
Health Serv Res. 2005 Aug;40(4):978-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00397.x.
3
Does the collaborative model improve care for chronic heart failure?
Community perception of causes of death using verbal autopsy for diabetes mellitus in Saudi Arabia.
沙特阿拉伯通过死因推断调查社区对糖尿病死因的认知情况。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Dec 5;3(12):e0001690. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001690. eCollection 2023.
4
Investigating the Needs of Caregivers of Patients Suffering from Chronic Diseases: A Mixed-Method Study.调查慢性病患者照顾者的需求:一项混合方法研究。
Indian J Palliat Care. 2023 Jul-Sep;29(3):285-291. doi: 10.25259/IJPC_179_2022. Epub 2023 Sep 2.
5
Psychometric evaluation of patient assessment of chronic illness care among Korean cancer survivors.韩国癌症幸存者慢性病照顾患者评估量表的心理计量学评估。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 12;16(8):e0256119. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256119. eCollection 2021.
6
Implementing the patient care collaborative model in three general internal medicine units: a mixed-methods healthcare improvement initiative.在三个普通内科病房实施患者护理协作模式:一项混合方法的医疗保健改进计划。
BMJ Open Qual. 2020 Apr;9(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000815.
7
Cardiometabolic-Based Chronic Disease, Adiposity and Dysglycemia Drivers: JACC State-of-the-Art Review.基于心脏代谢的慢性疾病、肥胖和糖代谢异常的驱动因素:JACC 最新综述。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Feb 11;75(5):525-538. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.11.044.
8
Implementation of the HEART Pathway: Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.HEART 路径的实施:运用实施研究的综合框架
Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2018 Dec;17(4):191-200. doi: 10.1097/HPC.0000000000000154.
9
Opposite trends in hospitalization and mortality after implementation of a chronic care model-based regional program for the management of patients with heart failure in primary care.在初级保健中实施基于慢性护理模式的区域性心力衰竭患者管理项目后,住院率和死亡率呈现相反趋势。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 May 30;18(1):388. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3164-0.
10
The effects of the introduction of a chronic care model-based program on utilization of healthcare resources: the results of the Puglia care program.基于慢性病护理模式的项目引入对医疗资源利用的影响:普利亚护理项目的结果
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 May 25;18(1):377. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3075-0.
协作模式是否能改善慢性心力衰竭的护理?
Med Care. 2005 Jul;43(7):667-75. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000167182.72251.a1.
4
Measuring the effectiveness of a collaborative for quality improvement in pediatric asthma care: does implementing the chronic care model improve processes and outcomes of care?衡量儿童哮喘护理质量改进协作的有效性:实施慢性病护理模式是否能改善护理流程和结果?
Ambul Pediatr. 2005 Mar-Apr;5(2):75-82. doi: 10.1367/A04-106R.1.
5
Association of hemoglobin A1c with cardiovascular disease and mortality in adults: the European prospective investigation into cancer in Norfolk.糖化血红蛋白A1c与成人心血管疾病及死亡率的关联:诺福克欧洲癌症前瞻性调查研究
Ann Intern Med. 2004 Sep 21;141(6):413-20. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-141-6-200409210-00006.
6
The independent effect of type 2 diabetes mellitus on ischemic heart disease, stroke, and death: a population-based study of 13,000 men and women with 20 years of follow-up.2型糖尿病对缺血性心脏病、中风和死亡的独立影响:一项基于人群的对13000名男性和女性进行20年随访的研究。
Arch Intern Med. 2004 Jul 12;164(13):1422-6. doi: 10.1001/archinte.164.13.1422.
7
Effects of a quality improvement collaborative on the outcome of care of patients with HIV infection: the EQHIV study.质量改进协作对HIV感染患者护理结局的影响:EQHIV研究
Ann Intern Med. 2004 Jun 1;140(11):887-96. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-140-11-200406010-00010.
8
Lipid control in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians.2型糖尿病管理中的血脂控制:美国医师学会临床实践指南
Ann Intern Med. 2004 Apr 20;140(8):644-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-140-8-200404200-00012.
9
An evaluation of collaborative interventions to improve chronic illness care. Framework and study design.改善慢性病护理的协作干预措施评估。框架与研究设计。
Eval Rev. 2004 Feb;28(1):28-51. doi: 10.1177/0193841X03256298.
10
Perceptions of cardiovascular risk among patients with hypertension or diabetes.高血压或糖尿病患者对心血管风险的认知。
Patient Educ Couns. 2004 Jan;52(1):47-53. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(02)00248-3.