• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

HEART 路径的实施:运用实施研究的综合框架

Implementation of the HEART Pathway: Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.

作者信息

Gesell Sabina B, Golden Shannon L, Limkakeng Alexander T, Carr Christine M, Matuskowitz Andrew, Smith Lane M, Mahler Simon A

机构信息

From the Departments of Social Sciences and Health Policy and Implementation Science, Wake Forest School of Medicine, One Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC.

Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, and Qualitative and Patient-Reported Outcomes Developing Shared Resource, Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wake Forest School of Medicine, One Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC.

出版信息

Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2018 Dec;17(4):191-200. doi: 10.1097/HPC.0000000000000154.

DOI:10.1097/HPC.0000000000000154
PMID:30418249
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6234854/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The HEART Pathway is an evidence-based decision tool for identifying emergency department (ED) patients with acute chest pain who are candidates for early discharge, to reduce unhelpful and potentially harmful hospitalizations. Guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, we sought to identify important barriers and facilitators to implementation of the HEART Pathway.

STUDY SETTING

Data were collected at 4 academic medical centers.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted semi-structured interviews with 25 key stakeholders (e.g., health system leaders, ED physicians). We conducted interviews before implementation of the HEART Pathway tool to identify potential barriers and facilitators to successful adoption at other regional academic medical centers. We also conducted postimplementation interviews at 1 medical center, to understand factors that contributed to successful adoption.

DATA COLLECTION

Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. We used a Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research framework-driven deductive approach for coding and analysis.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Potential barriers to implementation include time and resource burden, challenges specific to the electronic health record, sustained communication with and engagement of stakeholders, and patient concerns. Facilitators to implementation include strength of evidence for reduced length of stay and unnecessary testing and iatrogenic complications, ease of use, and supportive provider climate for evidence-based decision tools.

CONCLUSIONS

Successful dissemination of the HEART Pathway will require addressing institution-specific barriers, which includes engaging clinical and financial stakeholders. New SMART-FHIR technologies, compatible with many electronic health record systems, can overcome barriers to health systems with limited information technology resources.

摘要

目的

HEART 路径是一种基于证据的决策工具,用于识别急诊科(ED)中可早期出院的急性胸痛患者,以减少无益且可能有害的住院治疗。在实施研究综合框架的指导下,我们试图确定 HEART 路径实施过程中的重要障碍和促进因素。

研究背景

数据收集于 4 家学术医疗中心。

研究设计

我们对 25 名关键利益相关者(如卫生系统领导者、急诊科医生)进行了半结构化访谈。在实施 HEART 路径工具之前进行访谈,以确定其他地区学术医疗中心成功采用该工具的潜在障碍和促进因素。我们还在 1 家医疗中心实施后进行了访谈,以了解促成成功采用的因素。

数据收集

访谈进行了录音并逐字转录。我们采用实施研究综合框架驱动的演绎方法进行编码和分析。

主要发现

实施的潜在障碍包括时间和资源负担、电子健康记录特有的挑战、与利益相关者的持续沟通和参与以及患者的担忧。实施的促进因素包括缩短住院时间、减少不必要检查和医源性并发症的证据强度、易用性以及支持基于证据的决策工具的医疗服务提供者氛围。

结论

HEART 路径的成功推广需要解决特定机构的障碍,这包括让临床和财务利益相关者参与进来。与许多电子健康记录系统兼容的新型 SMART-FHIR 技术可以克服信息技术资源有限的卫生系统的障碍。

相似文献

1
Implementation of the HEART Pathway: Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.HEART 路径的实施:运用实施研究的综合框架
Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2018 Dec;17(4):191-200. doi: 10.1097/HPC.0000000000000154.
2
Application of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to assess factors that may influence implementation of tobacco use treatment guidelines in the Viet Nam public health care delivery system.应用实施研究综合框架评估可能影响越南公共卫生保健系统中烟草使用治疗指南实施的因素。
Implement Sci. 2017 Feb 28;12(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0558-z.
3
Barriers and facilitators to HPV vaccination in primary care practices: a mixed methods study using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.初级保健机构中HPV疫苗接种的障碍与促进因素:一项运用整合性实施研究框架的混合方法研究
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 May 7;19(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0750-5.
4
Facilitators and barriers of sociodemographic data collection in Canadian health care settings: a multisite case study evaluation.加拿大医疗保健环境中社会人口数据收集的促进因素和障碍:多地点案例研究评估。
Int J Equity Health. 2018 Dec 27;17(1):186. doi: 10.1186/s12939-018-0903-0.
5
Formative evaluation and adaptation of pre-and early implementation of diabetes shared medical appointments to maximize sustainability and adoption.对糖尿病共享医疗预约的前期及早期实施进行形成性评估和调整,以最大限度地提高可持续性和采用率。
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Jul 7;19(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0797-3.
6
Incorporating patient-generated contextual data into care: Clinician perspectives using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Science.将患者生成的情境数据纳入护理中:使用整合实施科学框架的临床医生观点。
Healthc (Amst). 2020 Mar;8(1):100369. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2019.100369. Epub 2019 Aug 21.
7
Factors influencing implementation of a patient decision aid in a developing country: an exploratory study.影响发展中国家患者决策辅助工具实施的因素:一项探索性研究。
Implement Sci. 2017 Mar 21;12(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0569-9.
8
Electronic Health Record-Embedded Individualized Pain Plans for Emergency Department Treatment of Vaso-occlusive Episodes in Adults With Sickle Cell Disease: Protocol for a Preimplementation and Postimplementation Study.电子健康记录嵌入的成人镰状细胞病血管闭塞性发作急诊科治疗个性化疼痛计划:实施前和实施后研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Apr 16;10(4):e24818. doi: 10.2196/24818.
9
Implementing an Opt-in eConsult Program at Seven Academic Medical Centers: a Qualitative Analysis of Primary Care Provider Experiences.在七所学术医疗中心实施选择加入的电子咨询计划:初级保健提供者经验的定性分析。
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Aug;34(8):1427-1433. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05067-7. Epub 2019 Jun 13.
10
Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to produce actionable findings: a rapid-cycle evaluation approach to improving implementation.运用实施研究综合框架(CFIR)得出可付诸行动的结果:一种用于改进实施的快速循环评估方法。
Implement Sci. 2017 Feb 10;12(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0550-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Methods used to evaluate usability of mobile clinical decision support systems for healthcare emergencies: a systematic review and qualitative synthesis.用于评估医疗紧急情况中移动临床决策支持系统可用性的方法:一项系统综述与定性综合分析
JAMIA Open. 2023 Jul 12;6(3):ooad051. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooad051. eCollection 2023 Oct.
2
Vocal cord dysfunction after pediatric cardiac surgery: A prospective implementation study.小儿心脏手术后的声带功能障碍:一项前瞻性实施研究。
JTCVS Open. 2022 Jun 9;11:398-411. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2022.06.003. eCollection 2022 Sep.
3
Untapped Potential for Emergency Department Observation Unit Use: A National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS) Study.急诊观察单元利用的未开发潜力:一项全国医院门诊医疗调查(NHAMCS)研究。
West J Emerg Med. 2022 Jan 18;23(2):134-140. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2021.8.52231.
4
Implementing an electronic health record dashboard for safe anticoagulant management: learning from qualitative interviews with existing and potential users to develop an implementation process.实施用于安全抗凝管理的电子健康记录仪表板:通过对现有用户和潜在用户的定性访谈汲取经验以制定实施流程。
Implement Sci Commun. 2022 Feb 2;3(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s43058-022-00262-w.
5
An implementation science approach to geriatric screening in an emergency department.一种在急诊科进行老年综合评估的实施科学方法。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 Jan;70(1):178-187. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17481. Epub 2021 Sep 27.
6
Improving Communication with Patients Discharged from the Emergency Department with Noncardiac Chest Pain: A Scoping Review with Narrative Synthesis.改善与因非心源性胸痛从急诊科出院患者的沟通:一项叙事综合的范围综述
Emerg Med Int. 2021 Aug 31;2021:6695210. doi: 10.1155/2021/6695210. eCollection 2021.
7
New Standards for Clinical Decision Support: A Survey of The State of Implementation.临床决策支持新规范:实施现状调查。
Yearb Med Inform. 2021 Aug;30(1):159-171. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1726502. Epub 2021 Sep 3.
8
Reduced admission rates and resource utilization for chest pain patients using an electronic health record-embedded clinical pathway in the emergency department.在急诊科使用嵌入电子健康记录的临床路径可降低胸痛患者的住院率和资源利用率。
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2020 Nov 17;1(6):1602-1613. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12308. eCollection 2020 Dec.
9
Study protocol for IMAGE: implementing multidisciplinary assessments for geriatric patients in an emergency department observation unit, a hybrid effectiveness/implementation study using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.IMAGE研究方案:在急诊科观察单元对老年患者实施多学科评估,一项使用实施研究综合框架的有效性/实施混合研究。
Implement Sci Commun. 2020 Feb 25;1:28. doi: 10.1186/s43058-020-00015-7. eCollection 2020.
10
Barriers to and facilitators of the implementation of multi-disciplinary care pathways in primary care: a systematic review.多学科照护路径在基层医疗实施的阻碍与促进因素:系统回顾。
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Jun 19;21(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01179-w.

本文引用的文献

1
Application of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to assess factors that may influence implementation of tobacco use treatment guidelines in the Viet Nam public health care delivery system.应用实施研究综合框架评估可能影响越南公共卫生保健系统中烟草使用治疗指南实施的因素。
Implement Sci. 2017 Feb 28;12(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0558-z.
2
A systematic review of implementation frameworks of innovations in healthcare and resulting generic implementation framework.对医疗保健创新实施框架及由此产生的通用实施框架的系统评价。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2015 Mar 14;13:16. doi: 10.1186/s12961-015-0005-z.
3
Quantifying Patient-Physician Communication and Perceptions of Risk During Admissions for Possible Acute Coronary Syndromes.量化可能急性冠状动脉综合征患者入院期间的医患沟通和风险感知。
Ann Emerg Med. 2015 Jul;66(1):13-8, 18.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2015.01.027. Epub 2015 Mar 4.
4
The HEART Pathway randomized trial: identifying emergency department patients with acute chest pain for early discharge.HEART 路径随机试验:识别可早期出院的急性胸痛急诊科患者。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2015 Mar;8(2):195-203. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.114.001384. Epub 2015 Mar 3.
5
A qualitative systematic review of studies using the normalization process theory to research implementation processes.运用规范化进程理论研究实施过程的定性系统评价研究。
Implement Sci. 2014 Jan 2;9:2. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-9-2.
6
A prospective validation of the HEART score for chest pain patients at the emergency department.急诊科胸痛患者HEART评分的前瞻性验证。
Int J Cardiol. 2013 Oct 3;168(3):2153-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.01.255. Epub 2013 Mar 7.
7
Identifying patients for early discharge: performance of decision rules among patients with acute chest pain.识别适合提前出院的患者:急性胸痛患者中决策规则的表现。
Int J Cardiol. 2013 Sep 30;168(2):795-802. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.10.010. Epub 2012 Oct 30.
8
Can the HEART score safely reduce stress testing and cardiac imaging in patients at low risk for major adverse cardiac events?HEART评分能否安全地减少主要不良心脏事件低风险患者的压力测试和心脏成像?
Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2011 Sep;10(3):128-33. doi: 10.1097/HPC.0b013e3182315a85.
9
Heart disease and stroke statistics--2011 update: a report from the American Heart Association.心脏病和中风统计数据--2011 年更新:来自美国心脏协会的报告。
Circulation. 2011 Feb 1;123(4):e18-e209. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e3182009701. Epub 2010 Dec 15.
10
The effect of physician risk tolerance and the presence of an observation unit on decision making for ED patients with chest pain.医生风险容忍度和观察单元的存在对急诊科胸痛患者决策的影响。
Am J Emerg Med. 2010 Sep;28(7):771-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2009.03.019. Epub 2010 Feb 25.