Rud B, Hilden J, Hyldstrup L, Hróbjartsson A
Osteoporosis Unit 545, Department of Endocrinology, Hvidovre University Hospital, Kettegaard Allé 30, 2650, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Osteoporos Int. 2007 Sep;18(9):1177-87. doi: 10.1007/s00198-006-0319-3. Epub 2007 Mar 15.
The Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool (OST) is a simple test that may be of clinical value to rule-out low bone mineral density. We performed a systematic review to assess its performance in postmenopausal women. We included 36 studies. OST performed moderately in ruling-out femoral neck T-score <or= -2.5, but poorly in ruling-out lumbar spine T-score <or= -2.5. Methodological study quality was generally low.
The Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool (OST) is a simple clinical decision rule based on age and weight that may be of clinical value to rule-out low bone mineral density (BMD). Our aim was to systematically assess the performance of OST in postmenopausal women.
We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, citation lists and conference proceedings for studies evaluating OST using dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) as reference test to measure BMD. We evaluated methodological quality using the QUADAS checklist. Our main outcome was the likelihood ratio of a negative OST result (LR-).
OST performed moderately in ruling-out femoral neck T-score <or= -2.5 in whites, summary LR- (sLR-) 0.19 (95% CI, 0.17-0.21) and between-study heterogeneity was low (I(2) = 7%). The corresponding performance in Asians was similar, sLR- 0.19 (0.14-0.28), but there was considerable heterogeneity (I(2) = 64%). OST performed poorly in ruling-out lumbar spine T-score <or= -2.5 in whites and Asians, sLR- 0.43 (0.31-0.59) and 0.32 (0.28-0.38), respectively. The performance in ruling-out T-score <or= -2.0 in whites was poor regardless of region (sLR- >or=0.28). Methodological study quality was generally low.
The clinical usefulness of OST is uncertain. OST could be useful for ruling-out femoral neck T-score <or= -2.5, but confirmatory high-quality studies are needed.
骨质疏松自我评估工具(OST)是一项简单的测试,可能对排除低骨密度具有临床价值。我们进行了一项系统评价,以评估其在绝经后女性中的性能。我们纳入了36项研究。OST在排除股骨颈T值≤ -2.5方面表现中等,但在排除腰椎T值≤ -2.5方面表现较差。方法学研究质量总体较低。
骨质疏松自我评估工具(OST)是一种基于年龄和体重的简单临床决策规则,可能对排除低骨密度(BMD)具有临床价值。我们的目的是系统评估OST在绝经后女性中的性能。
我们检索了PubMed、Embase、科学网、参考文献列表和会议论文集,以查找使用双能X线吸收法(DXA)作为测量BMD的参考测试来评估OST的研究。我们使用QUADAS清单评估方法学质量。我们的主要结果是OST阴性结果(LR-)的似然比。
OST在排除白人股骨颈T值≤ -2.5方面表现中等,汇总LR-(sLR-)为0.19(95%CI,0.17 - 0.21),研究间异质性较低(I² = 7%)。在亚洲人中的相应表现相似,sLR-为0.19(0.14 - 0.28),但存在相当大的异质性(I² = 64%)。OST在排除白人和亚洲人腰椎T值≤ -2.5方面表现较差,sLR-分别为0.43(0.31 - 0.59)和0.32(0.28 - 0.38)。无论区域如何,OST在排除白人T值≤ -2.0方面表现都很差(sLR-≥0.28)。方法学研究质量总体较低。
OST的临床实用性尚不确定。OST可能有助于排除股骨颈T值≤ -2.5,但需要高质量的验证性研究。