Suppr超能文献

在人格强化敏感性理论的行为测试中区分学习与动机。

Distinguishing between learning and motivation in behavioral tests of the reinforcement sensitivity theory of personality.

作者信息

Smillie Luke D, Dalgleish Len I, Jackson Chris J

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Goldsmiths, University of London.

出版信息

Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2007 Apr;33(4):476-89. doi: 10.1177/0146167206296951. Epub 2007 Mar 15.

Abstract

According to Gray's (1973) Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory (RST), a Behavioral Inhibition System (BIS) and a Behavioral Activation System (BAS) mediate effects of goal conflict and reward on behavior. BIS functioning has been linked with individual differences in trait anxiety and BAS functioning with individual differences in trait impulsivity. In this article, it is argued that behavioral outputs of the BIS and BAS can be distinguished in terms of learning and motivation processes and that these can be operationalized using the Signal Detection Theory measures of response-sensitivity and response-bias. In Experiment 1, two measures of BIS-reactivity predicted increased response-sensitivity under goal conflict, whereas one measure of BAS-reactivity predicted increased response-sensitivity under reward. In Experiment 2, two measures of BIS-reactivity predicted response-bias under goal conflict, whereas a measure of BAS-reactivity predicted motivation response-bias under reward. In both experiments, impulsivity measures did not predict criteria for BAS-reactivity as traditionally predicted by RST.

摘要

根据格雷(1973)的强化敏感性理论(RST),行为抑制系统(BIS)和行为激活系统(BAS)介导目标冲突和奖励对行为的影响。BIS的功能与特质焦虑的个体差异有关,而BAS的功能与特质冲动性的个体差异有关。在本文中,有人认为,BIS和BAS的行为输出可以根据学习和动机过程来区分,并且可以使用信号检测理论中的反应敏感性和反应偏差测量方法来进行操作化。在实验1中,两种BIS反应性测量方法预测在目标冲突下反应敏感性会增加,而一种BAS反应性测量方法预测在奖励下反应敏感性会增加。在实验2中,两种BIS反应性测量方法预测在目标冲突下的反应偏差,而一种BAS反应性测量方法预测在奖励下的动机反应偏差。在两个实验中,冲动性测量方法均未像RST传统预测的那样预测BAS反应性的标准。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验