Smillie Luke D, Jackson Chris J
School of Psychology, University of Queensland, Australia.
J Pers. 2006 Feb;74(1):47-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00369.x.
In this article, we attempt to integrate Dickman's (1990) descriptive concept of Functional Impulsivity (FI) with Gray's (1970, 1991) Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory (RST). Specifically, we consider that FI bears great conceptual similarity to Gray's concept of reward-reactivity, which is thought to be caused by the combined effects of a Behavioral Activation System (BAS) and Behavioral Inhibition System (BIS). In our first study, we examine the construct validity and structural correlates of FI. Results indicate that FI is related positively to measures of BAS and Extraversion, negatively to measures of BIS and Neuroticism, and is separate from Psychoticism and typical trait Impulsivity, which Dickman calls Dysfunctional Impulsivity (DI). In our second study, we use a go/no-go discrimination task to examine the relationship between FI and response bias under conditions of rewarding and punishing feedback. Results indicate that FI, along with two measures of BAS, predicted the development of a response bias for the rewarded alternative. In comparison, high DI appeared to reflect indifference toward either reward or punishment. We consider how these findings might reconcile the perspectives of Gray and Dickman and help clarify the broader understanding of Impulsivity.
在本文中,我们试图将迪克曼(1990年)的功能性冲动(FI)描述性概念与格雷(1970年、1991年)的强化敏感性理论(RST)相结合。具体而言,我们认为FI与格雷的奖励反应性概念在概念上有很大的相似性,奖励反应性被认为是由行为激活系统(BAS)和行为抑制系统(BIS)的综合作用引起的。在我们的第一项研究中,我们检验了FI的结构效度和结构相关性。结果表明,FI与BAS和外向性的测量呈正相关,与BIS和神经质的测量呈负相关,并且与精神病性和典型特质冲动性(迪克曼称之为功能失调性冲动性(DI))不同。在我们的第二项研究中,我们使用了一个Go/No-Go辨别任务来检验在奖励和惩罚反馈条件下FI与反应偏差之间的关系。结果表明,FI与BAS的两个测量指标一起,预测了对奖励选项的反应偏差的发展。相比之下,高DI似乎反映了对奖励或惩罚的冷漠。我们思考了这些发现如何调和格雷和迪克曼的观点,并有助于更全面地理解冲动性。