Lee Yih-Shiunn, Huang Hui-Ling, Lo Ting-Ying, Hsieh Yi-Fang, Huang Chien-Rae
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Lin Shin Hospital, No. 36, Section 3, Huizhong Rd., Nanton District, Taichung City 408, Taiwan.
Int Orthop. 2008 Aug;32(4):541-5. doi: 10.1007/s00264-007-0352-7. Epub 2007 Mar 16.
Although several surgical techniques for midclavicular fractures have been reported, Knowles pinning has rarely been compared with plating. The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical results of these two alternative techniques. There were 88 patients with midclavicular fractures surgically treated with either a Knowles pin or a plate. All patients were followed up for 12 months with a shoulder score evaluation. The Knowles pin group included 56 patients, with an average age of 40.1 years. The plate group included 32 patients, with an average age of 38.2 years. Both groups were similar in injury mechanism and fracture types (all p values>0.5). Plating has a significantly longer operation time, larger wound incision, higher pain level, more analgesic use, more complications and more symptomatic hardware (all p value<0.05). The shoulder score, union rate and healing time are not significantly different between the two groups (all p values>0.2). In conclusion, if the surgery of mid-third clavicular fractures is indicated, fixation with a Knowles pin has more advantages than plate fixation.
尽管已有多种治疗锁骨中段骨折的手术技术被报道,但克氏针固定术与钢板固定术的对比却鲜有研究。本研究旨在比较这两种治疗方法的临床效果。选取88例接受克氏针或钢板手术治疗的锁骨中段骨折患者,所有患者均随访12个月并进行肩部评分。克氏针组56例,平均年龄40.1岁;钢板组32例,平均年龄38.2岁。两组患者在损伤机制和骨折类型方面相似(所有p值>0.5)。钢板固定术的手术时间明显更长、伤口切口更大、疼痛程度更高、镇痛药物使用更多、并发症更多且内固定物相关症状更多(所有p值<0.05)。两组间肩部评分、骨折愈合率及愈合时间无显著差异(所有p值>0.2)。总之,对于锁骨中段骨折患者,若需手术治疗,克氏针固定术较钢板固定术更具优势。